- First Name
- Roger
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 2,426
- Location
- Aurora, Co
- Vehicle(s)
- 17 mustang gt, 3 Wrangler JLs
- Your Bronco Model
- Wildtrak
Good post!!!!!!First, for those that believe that Ford should be prohibiting ADM, they can't -- the dealer lobbies have been very effective in ensuring dealer franchise laws block that. At most they can "cajole" the dealers.
My apologies for the length of what follows; feel free to skip it all.
The primary reason I was looking forward to x-plan was not the discount -- I've already moved to Stephens, and at $1000 below invoice, an additional $25 ($300 benefit-$275 x-plan fee) was trivial. The driver for me was the x-plan's cap on dealer processing fees.
Background for what follows at the end:
I've purchased 7-8 Fords from the local Ford store. In each case I bargained on cars they needed to move, usually at the end of the quarter when sales quotas were weighing heavily on the mind of the new car sales desk manager of the day. In every one of these cases, after stating:
(i) that I believed processing costs were overhead (you'd never get charged a processing fee for a vehicle such as a bicycle),
(ii) that as I understood it, these fees were originated by some clever dealer in New England in 1967 that decided to try increase profit by adding a $25 ($50?) processing fee to see whether customers would balk (which they didn't), and they've simply grown exponentially as dealers have found that most sheep will accept them (especially with the "we have to include it in every deal for legal reasons") -- to which one honest manager readily agreed, stating that their fee was "pure profit";
(iii) that I understand that the primary dealer profit centers are F&I, service and at some stores used cars, not new cars (i.e., they could afford to make a large profit on someone else -- maybe even me later in service/accessory purchases, as I've been dealer-loyal for 2 1/2 decades)
(iv) then they can lower the price of the vehicle by the processing fee if they want to complete the deal,
they happily accepted, knowing that at a *minimum* they'd more that make up the difference between what I was willing to pay and what other less-informed people would pay, likely just in the quota bonus.
Side note: I wasn't bargaining based on starting at "invoice" pricing (I started lower). "Invoice pricing" is a term that has totally lost any real meaning over the past few decades, as the published "invoice" prices have gone up faster than MSRPs -- in other words, Ford's "invoice" pricing no longer comes close to a dealer's true cost for the vehicle. This is the reason that for non-high-demand vehicles, many dealers are thrilled when you come in and say you want to pay "invoice": that is a guaranteed "no-loss" price, from which their only task is to get you to move up.
Side Note 2: For the record, I completely understand and accept that the dealer's "cost" also must include a reasonable mark-up to cover overhead (both fixed and variable costs) and provide a reasonable profit that keeps them in business.
It is in this context that I say that avoiding my local Ford dealer's ridiculous $799 processing fee was the #1 reason I was lured by x-plan pricing on a hot new vehicle. I absolutely do not need a Bronco (I already have an F-150, Mustang and C7 Corvette Z06 in the driveway, along with several BMW motorcycles). So given the choice between paying what I view as just another form of ADM now or waiting until I could get a good below-MSRP price, there was no question that I would have waited. Stephan's offer just means I'll get my loaded 4-dr Badlands sooner than I otherwise would.
I also agree. The dealers thought this was going to be a cash cow. Now they are starting to realize that it isnt. In the end all they are going to do is run people off. I think Ford was trying to help them out, but it isnt going to turn out how they wanted.
Sponsored