Motor Trend estimates it will start at 67k. The 392 comes with extra options standards such as premium audio, hard top, color matched flares, LED lighting, cold weather group, etc...The article mentions cost of the 392 should come under 50k, I have a hard time believing that. I would imagine more like 60k.
Itāll be more than $50k. The ecodiesel is a $4500 option and with that diesel and specs the same as this 392 rubicon comes in at $63k.The article mentions cost of the 392 should come under 50k, I have a hard time believing that. I would imagine more like 60k.
I just priced out a V6 gas Rubi at $57k modestly equipped. The V8 Rubi will easily top $70k+.The article mentions cost of the 392 should come under 50k, I have a hard time believing that. I would imagine more like 60k.
I think they will answer after they observe all the things ppl don't like so they can answer back with something better. Just like they did with the bronco we are getting. I really think the Windsor and the mustang be the point where they decide and V8. We all know they will never suff a 5.0. Also now the EPA restrictions be interesting. Wasn't EPA reason why the hellcat cherokee was scrapped. I thought I read something on that a while back. 2021 was the last year for them?Ford needs to release the Warthog for 2021. We canāt let the 392 release with no answers from the Bronco.
Ford GT 660 HP 3.5 Ecoboost but Fords not gonna do that. They should at least tune it to 450 with more torque than the 392 Wranglers.Forget the V8, only loss is the sound. The 3.5 in a F150 can make close to 800hp with a tune and some engine mods and the 2.7 around 680hp. That'll be plenty for the Bronco.
this should be cool in a straight line...