I can’t really see any difference in computer rendered interiors and all the differences . Who knows If that’s what they’ll actually be once delivered I have no idea lol
You would think the badlands being the most “off-road” model would have some lift over stock . Then wildtrak supposely being the most “desert racing” Baja type has more lift for suspension travel at high speed ? Who knows at this point . I’m basically betting on buying one for I tisk delivery then once all the options are available and the air clears getting a specific. Bronco 100% how I want the next year and hoping it doesn’t devalue too much on trade in
I have roughly the same plan. I’m ordering the Sasquatch package as a bridge gap plan until several aftermarket suspension solutions are available, and, more importantly, we know more about how these rigs behave when modified. I’m also hoping the Bronco proves to be more capable that my Tacoma. Tall order if you ask me.I agree no one needs beadlocks, and I would extend it to the entire Bronco.
But... I want it and it seams like a ton of fun! As far as beadlocks, yeah I will use them, I air my truck down to 18 for standard wheeling and 12 is as low as I dare for snow wheeling.
For me the decision would be to go non SAS and go strait to 37", but I will go SAS until others prove out how the stock driveline does on 37" and how Ford treats the warranty support.
In general the Bronco will be so much more capable than my Tacoma off road, nobody needs more...
Honestly starting to rethink my build . If it’s not a glitch and the badlands can chose the 4.70 no cost upgrade , and the big fact that the badlands tires are less then an inch smaller then Sasquatch 32.7 versus 34.4 I’m thinking may save the $2500 upgrade , go with more attractive badlands wheel (in my opinion) and maybe sell 33’s and buy true 35’s instead of 34.4 orrrrrr ??
But again all comes down to it Sasquatch has they diff suspension setup then badlands . Sheesh my head goes round and round. Safest bet may just be 4 door base with Sasquatch and hardtop and then wait till hype calms down and all options become available
You misunderstood- Squatch is a 1.5” lift over base-OB, but only 10mm higher than BL.
You could be right IF they were talking about total height, which they weren’t. He was comparing the two suspension systems.
I've pretty much decided to get an XL Ranger with FX4. I get trail control, more room, more towing, more payload, off road capible enough, plus a heck of a lot cheaper.
The 0.4” of suspension lift on a Squatched Badlands would make sense. That’s the difference between the 33s and M/Ts.
Yup. Some people heard it the way I described it and some heard it the way you described it.
They aren't talking about total vehicle height, they are talking about suspension height, which is what is important if trying to figure out what tire to use. If you wanted to put 29" tires on a Sasquatch Bronco, it would ride considerably lower (overall) than a Badlands, but the suspension height would be higher than the Badlands. You would still be able to put a 35" tire on it and raise the total vehicle height. If you can fit 40" tires in the wheel openings you'd raise the total vehicle height, but you wouldn't change the suspension height.
No, no, no. Tires don't impact suspension height, they are "under" the suspension. They raise the total vehicle by half the difference in overall diameter, but they don't raise the suspension.
