Sponsored

2.3 vs 2.7 compromise

F OR D

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
1,485
Reaction score
3,256
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
BD Green Machine
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
Clubs
 
I lol at the fact that you put that must trust on one of the most failure prone parts of that engine and your getting 2 dunk em good in the mud and call me at 100000 .
Dude I'll never hit 100, will flip before especially being the first run.
Sponsored

 

johndeerefarmer

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
508
Reaction score
549
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
'17 F150, '20 F350 Powerstroke
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
So I've been giving the 2.3L vs 2.7L engine a lot of thought and I think that I may have come up with a way in which the 2.7 may wind up actually being cheaper, and yes, this is me totally trying to justify the bigger engine to myself. Let's say, just for the sake of simplicity that I'm going to drive the Bronco for 100k miles. Also for the sake of simplicity, let's say that the truck is going to be SAS, so the comparable MPGs would be 18 (2.3) vs 17 (2.7).

Yes, I know I could run regular in either of them, but just for these purposes let's say that I want some degree of extra power beyond what the 2.3 gets on regular. If I went ahead and ran premium on the 2.3 in order to get the full specs vs regular on the 2.7 where I'd still get 315 hp/410 torque which is plenty. In my area right now, regular is $2.99 and premium is $3.94. So here's how that lands over 100k miles (obviously gas prices will vary here, but again just for simplicity's sake).

Cost to drive 2.3 SAS 100k miles with premium fuel at $3.94/gal and 18 MPG = $21,889.
Cost to drive 2.7 SAS 100k miles with regular fuel at $2.99/gal and 17 MPG = $17,588
Delta between the 2 = $4,301
Cost to add 2.7 to build = $1,895
Long term savings = $2,406

Thanks for patronizing me on my quest to justify my decisions to myself.
If you want the 2.7 just buy it, why make up some BS scenario where it works out on paper for you? If you "think" you might want more power than the 2.3 gives then you might also want more power than the 2.7 gives on low octane so just as well to plan on running premium in both.
If you only run premium in the 2.3 when you actually needed it, when would that be? Probably only when hot or towing as those are the two times using premium actually makes a noticeable difference for an ecoboost engine. In that case you better recalculate your numbers and go with 10k miles of premium and 90k miles of regular which means you can't justify the 2.7 LOL
 

johndeerefarmer

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
508
Reaction score
549
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
'17 F150, '20 F350 Powerstroke
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
I always run regular in my 2.3 EcoBoost. Ford states it will make more power on Premium, but it feels just fine the way I drive it. Plenty of power, 43k miles without a problem, and two cross country and back trips. Assuming the Bronco is heavier and will be beat on a little more, I opted for the 2.7. Both, however, are great engines. I know a Ford employee who dailies a 2.3 Focus RS (with Mustang EcoBoost heads swapped in at 40k-50k miles) and now has over 200k miles on it.
Before Ford added port injection to the 3.5 ecoboost there were problems with deposits. After a class action lawsuit Ford added port injection in 2017 to fix this issue.

As far as premium goes I have towed 10-12k with my ecoboosts. When it's hot or towing is when you need to run premium so that's what I would do. Run the cheap stuff during the winter months and premium during the summer heat
 

NVCowboy

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
First Name
William
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
1,735
Location
Henderson, NV
Vehicle(s)
2002 F350. 2022 Big Bend (Sasquatch)
Your Bronco Model
Big Bend
I like the six for other reasons. Port injection and designed from the turbo down. Numbers ain't bad either.
 

Contact

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
First Name
Randy
Joined
Sep 11, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
636
Reaction score
1,118
Location
Austin, Texas
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Big Bend. FJ Cruiser
Your Bronco Model
Big Bend
Clubs
 
So I've been giving the 2.3L vs 2.7L engine a lot of thought and I think that I may have come up with a way in which the 2.7 may wind up actually being cheaper, and yes, this is me totally trying to justify the bigger engine to myself. Let's say, just for the sake of simplicity that I'm going to drive the Bronco for 100k miles. Also for the sake of simplicity, let's say that the truck is going to be SAS, so the comparable MPGs would be 18 (2.3) vs 17 (2.7).

Yes, I know I could run regular in either of them, but just for these purposes let's say that I want some degree of extra power beyond what the 2.3 gets on regular. If I went ahead and ran premium on the 2.3 in order to get the full specs vs regular on the 2.7 where I'd still get 315 hp/410 torque which is plenty. In my area right now, regular is $2.99 and premium is $3.94. So here's how that lands over 100k miles (obviously gas prices will vary here, but again just for simplicity's sake).

Cost to drive 2.3 SAS 100k miles with premium fuel at $3.94/gal and 18 MPG = $21,889.
Cost to drive 2.7 SAS 100k miles with regular fuel at $2.99/gal and 17 MPG = $17,588
Delta between the 2 = $4,301
Cost to add 2.7 to build = $1,895
Long term savings = $2,406

Thanks for patronizing me on my quest to justify my decisions to myself.
Cost to be happy...................Priceless.
 

Sponsored

Panmort

Outer Banks
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
1,173
Reaction score
3,205
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
22 Outer Banks Bronco
Your Bronco Model
Outer Banks
Clubs
 
The 2.3 will work fine for me. I don't need the extra power so I rather spend the difference on a higher trim, etc.
 

Streetfish

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
246
Reaction score
404
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2014 Toyota FJ Cruiser TTUE
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Genuinely curious for anyone who has a vehicle that has different power outputs based on octane ratings; can you actually tell the difference?
Not really in my experience, but I do notice a difference in fuel economy (higher octane better)
 

MattyAg

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Apr 27, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
421
Reaction score
1,515
Location
San Antonio
Vehicle(s)
Bronco
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
Did you factor 2 less spark plugs on the 2.3 into your calculations? Or the 7 quarts of oil in the 2.7? Over the life of the vehicle the 2.3 will be half the price of 2.7. I did the maths.

Ford Bronco 2.3 vs 2.7 compromise 984CC468-4C46-469F-8C85-38CAA4102112
 

GreyBronco

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Mar 19, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
100
Reaction score
135
Location
Akron
Vehicle(s)
Honda Element. 2 Civics and a Kawasaki ZRX1200R
Your Bronco Model
Base
Clubs
 
Copy and Pasted. Sent email to the wife. Priceless
 

85_Ranger4x4

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Threads
4
Messages
567
Reaction score
936
Location
Iowa
Vehicle(s)
1985 Ford Ranger
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
Did you factor 2 less spark plugs on the 2.3 into your calculations? Or the 7 quarts of oil in the 2.7? Over the life of the vehicle the 2.3 will be half the price of 2.7. I did the maths.

Ford Bronco 2.3 vs 2.7 compromise 984CC468-4C46-469F-8C85-38CAA4102112
I did factor the ease of changing said spark plugs.

Neat little row down the center of the engine has an appeal over a DOHC V6 shoehorned in.
 

Sponsored

Norm A.

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Norman
Joined
Aug 25, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
2,160
Location
91910
Vehicle(s)
F150
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Man you put a lot into that to justify you getting a 2.7, me I'm just getting it because I want it 😉
 

King Luis

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
675
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Toronto
Vehicle(s)
Volvo XC60 & MK5 Jetta TDI
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
Clubs
 
But the 2.3 has a manual. Savings there.
 

Daktari

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Oliver
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Threads
28
Messages
1,947
Reaction score
4,076
Location
24/680
Vehicle(s)
Badsquatch, Tacoma TRD Off Road, Jetta
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
I thought this was rather easy, there's a larger engine? Check. Done. I'll never buy an other manual car again, so didn't care about that part, I plan to keep this thing for a long time, so the price difference over the years is negligible and not worth thinking about. If you can afford it now, just get it, it'll be funner :)
 

NotApplicable

First Edition
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2020
Threads
36
Messages
1,889
Reaction score
4,874
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
BEVs
Your Bronco Model
First Edition
Both will propel the vehicle forward and neither will last as long as they used to.
 

Big Boss

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
1,948
Reaction score
4,458
Location
Outer Heaven
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Big Bend
Your Bronco Model
Big Bend
Genuinely curious for anyone who has a vehicle that has different power outputs based on octane ratings; can you actually tell the difference?
Yes you can tell but as Drex explains below it really isn't noticeable until the upper part of the power band.

My Mazda is 227 HP on regular and 250 on premium. It does feel a bit more lively with premium in it especially at the top of the power band but the bigger difference is that if I keep my foot out of it it returns better mpg on premium. Normally average 29 to 31 with 89 in it and with premium its 32 to 34

generally speaking torque outputs will be within a few percent of each other regardless of the fuel used (in a vehicle that will adjust). The perceived acceleration will be the same in normal driving. In real life, the only time you will see a difference is in the top 1/3 of the tachometer. That means you only get the additional power if you are hammering it full throttle or close to it. Think about how many miles you go at full throttle vs. normal driving. It is a vanishingly small percentage of time. (You accelerate at full chat getting on the highway and then set the cruise control for 150 miles of steady state velocity. I am not going to bother paying an extra $0.70 a gallon for all 150 miles driven for the slight (maybe a tenth or two faster to 60 MPH) for the tiny amount of time it takes to merge on a highway (and if I am cutting it so close that 1/5th of a second is the difference between merging safely and having a wreck, I should have my license revoked). That would work out to be about $6 in extra cost for 1/5 of a second time savings.

Unless you live your life a quarter-mile at a time, no rational person would run premium unless it is for emotional reasons, which is super, you do you, nobody cares.
Sponsored

 
 


Top