Can have many benefits I agree. I know another fella who was badly injured in a motorcycle accident. He was knocked unconscious and has no recollection of what happened. His Gopro camera was rolling tho, and captured the entire thing, which the cops were able to use to track down the person...
I was told by a customer that immigrated from there years ago that for years the economy over there was so bad that police didn't always get paid regularly or at all...Russian cops started supplementing their income by pulling over motorists who appeared to have money and "shaking them...
I reached out today. I have not updated the Procal, and still have full functionality, so I basically worded it as "how do I avoid losing functionality?". Hope that helps!
I guess I don't get the whole oil leak=loose bolts theory. Cars have leaked oil since they stopped using horses, and that never caused them to disassemble themselves. A tight bolt is a tight bolt whether it's oily or dry. I mean there are bolts inside the diff and they stay tight somehow...
when you enlarge the hole for the helicoil it will make it round again. Not saying it doesn't suck to have to do it, but if you are careful and use them right, helicoils are much stronger than the original thread. I would pull that busted bolt out of there 1st and see
IIRC he actually wanted to go to the superduty style because that's what the race units use. The early sets like mine got the Toyota style because he was doing Toyota right before Bronco and the bolt pattern is the same. Either way I don't think I want to mess w/mine now...it's all working for...
Seems to me that everyone having problems is on the super duty based hub bearing? Maybe the Toyota based hub bearing was the way to go? Only issue I have had is the wheel studs are so short...they have not given me problems, but because I take the wheels off for maintenance I felt like over...
Not exactly the same, but I come up with MB3Z-7061-E for a mainshaft #, which is what I came up with for Bronco w/ESOF, I came up with AB3Z-7061-L for the output flange tho...dunno what that would look like! Could be another number to try. 24+ Ranger is a different animal from 19+. When...
Well the only hard fact I have is the the upper picture you posted IS NOT backwards...that is 100% correct, front is at the top left. Hope the Ranger crowd can fill me in on the rest! Repairlink show 3 different pictures, but doesn't tell me which is which...I can pick out RR from memory tho
That is correct for Raptor...the rezeppa is after the center support bearing, and ranger uses a dana rear like Bronco, therefore rezeppa at the rear end flange...Ranger is VERY confusing! RR doubly so! However, what is interesting between those pics is that 4866 LOOKS the same
The whole shaft HAS to be different as @Dusty posted above there is a length difference, what matters is the flange/yoke whatever you want to call it on the front of the driveshaft...too bad Ford doesn't catalog those anymore
So over on the driveshaft side, I can't come up with a number for BN 4866. Maybe you can. If all 6g Ranger use the same 4866 flange then we have a yatzee!
Here is the parts catalog view for 2.3L Ranger w/part time 4x4.. Looks like what you are looking for would be part # MB3Z-7B214-B. Unfortunately repairlink shows zero availability...not unusual when a part is this new tho