This is what I get for spouting my mouth off about how reliable my truck has been..... I should’ve known. This happened on the way home today. Don’t know what the issue is but just thought it was funny after I said I’ve had no issues.
That’s what I was thinking when I posted the pic from my dash on the F150. I’m new here and wasn’t trying to state any facts just info from something that has a 2.7, is 4x4 and isn’t incredibly aerodynamic. What I do know is that my F150 MPG display can give wildly different results based on...
Apples to oranges I know but this is what my F150 2.7 4x4 3.73, says on the display. I reset it at my last oil change. Combination of city traffic, a bunch of idling, and one trip from So Cal to Utah.
This is my 1975 CJ5. 304 V8 had around 150 HP? Don’t judge the color, I bought it that way. A 4cyl bronco should run circles around old stuff like this though.
Only Ford to leave me stranded was a 5.4 in my 2006 Super Duty. Some type of EFI module went out without any warning. I look at all modern vehicles as being incredibly complicated machines that can be expensive to fix outside of warranty. My 1975 CJ-5 is still fairly easy to work on but anything...
My current ride is a 2018 F150 with the 2.7. About 47k miles without issue. Gas mileage is pretty good for a full-size 4x4 truck. I was a little weary of getting a turbo engine but I figured nobody really questions the reliability of the diesels these days so why not. Having said that, I’m sure...
I currently drive a 2018 F150 with the 2.7. Zero problems so far in 47,000 miles and it continues to impress. I’ll be going with the 2.7 in the Bronco. Seems to have different HP ratings though 310 vs 325 for the F150. Maybe a tuning difference?
Hello, brand new member here and am enjoying the site. I was initially disappointed about the IFS but for 99% of what most people will do it’s probably a better option. I’ve run the Rubicon twice and I can tell you it’s no joke. New Broncos looked good on it.