Search results

Final post to add to this thread ... It's clear by now that Panda Motorworks has abandoned ship and will not be providing the information that the promised a very long time ago. They've simply moved on.... The fact remains: I have yet to see any dyno which backs up their claim that this...

Have you considered doing a Texas flag or other designs? @Underground Graphics

Rough calculations at different rev ranges. I tried to plot out 3 in the 3/4/5k range.

Thank you for sharing this info. Just FYI... gains at peak hp & tq are 12.76% and 10.027% (not 15%) respectively. Would be curious if the place you did your pull could calculate the max percentage gains throughout the rev band vs just at peak numbers ?

Okay. But still... why haven't you (Panda) posted up your analysis and breakdown of the PPM's performance metrics as previously discussed...

Now we're in June and still don't have a post.... chris@pandamotorworks ???

Spot on. It def. works and now the people (like me) who care about facts and figures want a more detailed view of the maps and dyno charts to better be able to compare this product to others on the market and others coming down the pipe (i.e. a Ford Factory Tune).

any idea if they were the 2.7L engine ?

Seems like @Caleb@PandaMotorworks had something to say but deleted it ?

Super in depth demands? Since when is asking for dyno stats (that they already have) an unreasonable REQUEST for an engine tuning product on a 60k vehicle? It's literally the defacto standard in tuning.

Spot on. Yeah... I knew it was just a matter of time till someone else had a run in with him. Doesn't matter how cool / good of a product you make if you're still an A-hole to people behind closed doors.

Thanks for highlighting that, I glossed right over the Map 3/5 comparison comment. I know you said 2-3% gains between maps but just wondering if you could show the dyno data in a format where you're able to amalgamate stock and maps 1 through 7 (see example below).

Good write-up of the general philosophy of design and implementation changes being made but still lacking 2.7L graphs and analysis....

Good write up , but where's the 2.7L analysis ? Assume these are all on Map 7, but did you do any dyno pulls on other maps you can show? (i.e. I run Map 5 or 6 and would like to know what those figures look like).

I've very patiently waited in the wings for a response since January of this year to give Panda the benefit of the doubt that they would make good on their promise to provide a more robust explanation of the gains of their product. At this point, I'm not sure I really care anymore what's...

@Mitch Panda Motorworks - any response?

Yeah was wondering if I could use use an open ended wrench to break them free but with 65-75lbs of torque I doubt it.

Tried to install the front non-sas flaps over the weekend and I couldn't get a good fit on the two bolts. Curious if you or others have had to remove the tired to get a better angle on it.