Search results

Just throw in some positive caster..... with some $2k billet UCA *

Going off what fordauthority is stating - it’s near a passive drain plug ( depending on trim ) and they specifically stated a concern about hosing out... but we will see where they are located soon versus guessing. I for one still do not want them at all if they are under the seat.

I just don’t like the vents are on the floor. Drain plug near them or not, they will fill with water and rust....

I see a few things going on here Vertical mounted shock / shock mounts (versus slanted) Wider placement of said mount or smaller pan rod Better mounted rear lower control arms Hyper zooming on shocks look blurred Overall looks like the f150 raptor set up minus coils (shown below)

Any one know what BW T-Case number this is; hoping it’s new and close to what the raptor has but probably the 4417

You are correct even per ford the 3.0 is CGI (only direct injection though) https://www.ford.com/suvs/explorer/models/explorer-st/

side note. As I have them on my JK, check out rock slider engineering. They are the cleanest slides with a step. I’m 6‘3 wife is 5’6 and loves them.

yeah they aren’t for me... but once you get on the trail you’ll learn everything can be buffed out

I thought so too. But the two Instagram account that had the photos last night.. took them down this morning.

If the two door had an access cab set up I would get it... but 4 door.

Could be a model 2022, but this is a spy shot of it - to compete against the TRX.

concur the protruding isn’t a big deal if it’s close to the wheel - but we all know we are adding backspacing for some new wheels. O my.. I like Chevy, owned 2 .... but their set ups in the rear need to be taken out to the pasture and shot

The Bronco has a lower control arm that is mounted behind the axle. in addition the LCA appear dead straight, typical that is a plus on aftermarket parts that are 10x stronger and kosher if you mount to the frame-side versus the bronco’s under mount to the frame. Just depends how strong they...

IDK what that Frankenstein full size vehicle is but it and the 21 Raptor F-150 have a better rear end setup I wish they would us in the Bronco

Concur - it’s nothing to bash on Ford with the 3.0 Diesel - they just offer so many other great engines (probably to many) and the diesel doesn't make much sense. This is coming from a diesel advocate. Now look at Ram - 1 diesel, 1 V8, 1 crap V6; the diesel fills a void. Also I want to like...

A lot of miss information in here on Torsen/Helical Diffs and what is a beadlock capable wheels — just read up on the raptor. Anywho everything looks great and what I wanted - just hope they move the lower control arm mounting to be in front of the axles versus this weird behind/below setup...

If they keep the next GEN Ranger the same size - as it is as it’s essentially a global platform - and the spy shots of the next GEN F150 or showing it’s going to be larger Give me this thing about the size of what the Rivian R1T is... it fills the need of people saying mid size are too small...

Off topic, from your topic (OT-FYT) but another reason I like the 2.7 TT EB over the 3.0 TT EB, is it’s dual PI and DI... from what I’ve read the 3.0 is only DI.

The 2.7 is CGI. The 3.0 and 3.5 is Aluminum. I really like CGI, diesel guy, so I prefer the 2.7.

I don’t believe that is the RR setup - from what I’ve read (and on TFL) that’s the 150 Raptor’s updated suspension to compete against the TRX. Also it’s not a Watts Link (Watt isn’t great for OR) it’s a panhard setup.