Search results

You can always add a strap from the carrier to the top of the spare tire to distribute the load some..... just a suggestion.

I understand the swing tailgates for the 4Ds so that some reach challenged people can reach things. That's not an issue with the 2D. I wish that @fomoco would have followed the EB for the 2D with a Swing Away Tire Carrier, Drop Down Tailgate and Lift Up Rear Glass on the Hardtop.

When the aftermarket makes one for the new Rangers, it "might" work on the Bronco. But that will not increase the Tow Limit, as that's currently dictated by the Rear Suspension, as it's configured for more Off Road Articulation than Towing.

Bump to the top..... Any updates??????

@bigblockfox545 .... can you elaborate on what happens when the Electronic E-Brake is engaged during an emergency situation when the vehicle is at speed? Does it engage gradually? All I know is that with a Manual Hand E-Brake, I can adjust the brake force as needed during an emergency.

I totally agree!!!!!

I don't know....

Once a Frame Mounted Hitch for the new Ranger that shares the frame with the Bronco has been made by one of the aftermarket manufacturers, then there's a potential solution. But just remember that the rear suspension (shocks/springs) should also be updated with stiffer components so that rear...

It has been a while, so..... any news about when FoMoCo will start putting the updated 2.3L in the Bronco's?

So..... G6.5 it is....

I agree..... So.... will the MY25 be a true G7 or just a G6.5? I'm hoping for a True G7. I guess that I should start a "What's you wish list for MY25?" thread...... maybe later.... kinda want to see the MY24s out and about, along with buyer comments.

With the current DI, no fuel (Tier 3 or additives) will wash off the build-up that the PCV can introduce into the airstream, which tend to adhere to the upstream side of the intake valve. This isn't the cast with PI, as it will introduce fuel to the upstream side of the intake valve and by...

It's the fact that the "current" 4cyl is a DI only fuel injection system. At a bare minimum, I want a DI & PI injection system (which the V6 has). In time, the Bronco should get the newer 2.3L with DI & PI (which would work for me), but until then, I will just have to wait. So in short, in...

Cough... Cough.... I haven't bought a Bronco yet, but I would have IF the 2.7L would have been offered with the MT. I might never buy one. It will all depend on what changes FoMoCo does to future Broncos.

The MT can be "configured" to handle way more than the 2.7L could ever produce. We, well... this forum had that discussion a few years ago. We also questioned FoMoCo on why they chose to not have a Bolt-On Bell Housing. During original development it would have been extremely easy to have done...

I know that this is a old thread, as I posted in it a while back..... I'm still unrealistically holding out a Snowballs Chance in H@ll that @Fordmotorcompany will offer the 2.7L with a MT. I know that it's not looking good..... so hopefully they at least give us the 2.3L with the DI & PI (and...

Been (Bean) Counter it is then! :p :) Either way, they (@Ford Motor Company) already had a proven and across several other products (aka Common and an already Cost Effective design), but Chose to go the route that they did, so the blame actually falls onto Management.

My only issue with the 2.3L is/was it being DI only. I also want a MT and the 2.7L with DI & PI doesn't have a MT option. So my only hope appears to be @Ford Motor Company putting the 2.3L DI/PI in the Bronco so that I can get my DI/PI/MT. It's also a much more likely it will happed vs...

My point was that the E Brake should be a totally separate system. There are other situations where with it being an Electric E Brake, it's function or not comes (loss of electrical power/wet broken wiring) into question. If it were a Manual E Brake, those function/non-function moments are...

Color Matched Flares should be Standard on the Baptor!!!! (yes, I said it) @Ford Motor Company