NM looked it up...5600LB. and it's the 3.0l(hoping bronco gets 2.7eb as I feel it's a better engine longevity wise with pfi/di and CGI)
I expect between that 5600# rating and the ranger 7500#
The way sunny Joe describes the vehicle size to me, says it's considerably larger than the Wrangler. The width will help with towing. What are the tow ratings of the explorer with 2.3 vs 2.7? I expect similar ratings on bronco.
I imagine the bronco will have a similar "ride" like a pickup. The standard trims will be driven 98% of time on road. I wouldn't be surprised if towing topped 7k.(especially with 2.7eb)
With the width being described as on par with F150 width, I would bet the bronco will come with similar towing figures similar to the ranger. Exciting to hear.
Dims people, how about length sized up to Wrangler. While 4dr Wrangler is 4 in longer wheelbase, curious to see how the body sizes up.
Maybe even width?
Great shots! I actually like the suspension views as 98% of my driving is on road. Next we need center console or underneath pics of transmission and oil pans to play guess what drivetrain!
First post. From what I read up until yesterday was v6 and 2.3EB Were engines listed(no info on v6 n/a or EB)
WIKI(yes the most reliable source ) is listing 2.7EB.
Just more rumor for whatever it's worth. I would highly look forward to 2.7EB and 3 pedals.