To expand on "yes"; commodities are a know build hangup and they likely won't add too many parts they're concerned about running out of to the test ones.
*Bronco6G* If ThIs MeAnS tHe FaNcY HeAdLiGhTs WiLl DeLaY mY BuIld i'M oUt!!!!!!
I feel like the marketing/sales decision made the engineering issue a non-factor. No point in engineering them to be compatible when you have no plans to combine them from the start. Plus it looks better to say "No one wants it" than "We could do it, but we won't".
Its all relative:
"I drive a 2-door therefore 4-doors are for posers."
"I drive a manual because I'm a 'real man'"
"Anything less than an old, underpowered, gas sucking, big block V8 is for sissies"
Unless you go with angry eyes or 20" dubs I think you'll be ok.
The way I see it is you can either have off-road goodies with the BD *or* tech goodies with the OBX. If they offered both in the same trim there wouldn't be any reason to step up to the higher trims.
Hooray capitalism.
Those nannies aren't there for the 25% of drivers who actually enjoy driving (aka, us). They're there for the vast majority of people who either can't drive or see driving as a chore and therefore don't pay attention like they should. While robots aren't perfect drivers I would argue they're...
Yea and while we're at it, electric starters are for sissies. Did my great-grandfather complain about breaking his wrist trying to get his old Model T going? I for one think that every advancement in comfort and capability has ruined us and made us soft. Shoot, why don't we just go back to...