Search results

This will not be well accepted - rock chips are due to tailgating. My son drives a sedan with a very laid-back windshield and he gets tons of rock chips because he tailgates. I’ve never had a rock chip in 40 years of driving and that has nothing to do with my windshield.

I assume it’s only available in a four-door?

Removing those hideous fenders is the best thing you could do anyway.

If your new tires are significantly heavier, that will also drop your mileage noticeably. Any unsprung weight kills performance. If they’re not heavier and they are basically the same diameter then it’s just driving style. To get good mileage you need to stay at or below the speed limit, Feather...

So you’re cranking over a cold engine without starting it?

Oh, so you remove the top and then install the accessories and then reinstall the top?

That’s way too much leverage on your Bronco hitch. Is there a weight distributing hitch you can use? Or remove the spare when towing?

I received the cart for my two door because they said that it would work with the two door but it did not. It’s good quality and easy to assemble but the front two brackets on the clam shell fell right on top of the bars and pads, so it wouldn’t sit in there properly. I assume it would work fine...

That doesn’t look like it would even give a Bronco Sport any competition.

Any cool uses for the holes pictured? I just noticed them when I had my top off and realized the same screws that hold the top down also fit right into those holes. I didn’t know if there is anything that they could be used for that might be handy when the top is off. It’s a two door if that...

The reason I know they’re slower than the 2.7 is my sons both have the coyote in their F150s but they both sound fantastic. However, they can’t touch the performance of my F150 with a 2.7, especially when towing. Maybe they just got lucky with their exhaust system.

I didn’t think it was possible to make a two-door hideous, but they’ve succeeded. Plus, they use the slower, naturally aspirated coyote V8 in it. Nothing about that vehicle makes sense. At least the exhaust will sound good.

If your traction is not an issue, just put it in 4 low and ease it out. If traction for you is an issue, you need as little power as possible so I would use 4 high and try not to break your tires loose. If it’s muddy, you will need tire spin, so in that case, I would probably use 4 low to keep...

Depends on the driver. I get 200,000 easily but if you’re on the brakes too much I could see them not lasting even 50,000. The longer your brakes last the better fuel mileage you’ll get too.

It could be just like the older Broncos. The spare tire was mounted on a swing arm, so you would swing it out-of-the-way before you opened the independent tailgate.

You’re welcome to go for a ride with us if the data provided above isn’t convincing enough. I also have a late model Mustang GT that is fun but feels sluggish compared to my 2.7 Bronco and 2.7 F-150. The Coyote has no low rpm grunt so unless it’s rapped out tight, it is relatively slow.

We have all three engines in F-150’s and the coyote sounds better but either Ecoboost outperforms it in every performance category, especially when towing. The numbers shown below are for similarly set up crew cab 4X4 F-150’s.

My boat engine never gets wet so that makes sense. The lower unit gets wet but it is made to regularly get wet. I assume that Bronco, like many Broncos, wasn’t treated very well by the previous owner.

Water, raw metal, + air = rust

My understanding is that they put the coyote in these but it was naturally aspirated. Why would they do that? Maybe I’m mistaken. We have F150s with the 5.0 and the 2.7 in them and the 2.7 absolutely roasts the coyote equipped trucks. My son finally put a supercharger on his coyote in his F150...