- Thread starter
- #1
So I’m trying to figure out if the power curve on the 2.7 is linear. As I’m thinking a linear power curve is what’s desired in off road conditions. Also how it compares to the coyote. Advantage/disadvantage?
Sponsored
2.7 vs 3.5:So I’m trying to figure out if the power curve on the 2.7 is linear. As I’m thinking a linear power curve is what’s desired in off road conditions. Also how it compares to the coyote. Advantage/disadvantage?
Crosses over at ~5252, what am I missing?Something is wrong with those Ecoboost graphs... Look at the crossover.
Except it doesn't, it's crossing over at ~4600. I think their rpm scaling is off.Crosses over at ~5252, what am I missing?
You SHUT your mouth! That's dirty talk! Oh and be ready to record you eating bat.....from Wuhan!We really shouldn't even be comparing the 2. There is a 0% chance the Coyote will be offered in the Bronco. It's a 90* V-8 with dual overhead cams. The heads are pretty massive and the engine itself is wide. It's not fitting in the ranger platform (modified or not). The Ecoboost V6's are 60* V and are more compact. If Ford announces the Coyote as an engine option, I'll eat a bat from Wuhan.
The 2.7 is stout. We would be lucky to get it. It out performs what is currently offered in the Bronco competitors by a large margin.
Ah, I think I was looking at the other graph, my bad.Except it doesn't, it's crossing over at ~4600. I think their rpm scaling is off.