2.7L Bronco Wildtrak 4-Door Window Sticker (With MPG Ratings)

[TheRealJyushi]

So, a Bronco showed up in the inventory system at my job. After doing some digging, I was able to find the Window Sticker, which includes the MPG Ratings. This one is most likely one of our FCTP Demos…shows up in the system as “In Transit”

Sponsored

 

[Funkdoobiest]

17mpg city or highway ain't great but could be a heck of a lot worse. I'm trying to picture a fairing to use like a larger laid back windshield to connect from the front tie downs up to the roof rack. It would give it that Tesla Truck wind deflection. Any fuel economy guesses?

 

[Chief1301]

Wow! I get about the same average MPG in my 2012 Mustang GT Coyote 5.0, with my new Tremec T-56 Magnum XL 6 speed MT. When I'm not racing around.

 

[Beach_Bum]

Another MIC not going to a paying customer...

 

[xcxv]

“Small SUV”

 

[Klink]

Looks like a range of 353 miles on a full tank. 20.8 gallons X 17mpg.

 

[Klink]

And why would the dealer get the tow package?

 

[Drex]

Matches the 392 Wrangler on the highway and only one less than a stock Badlands, how extremely ordinary. Godzilla or a variant would probably be equal or better than the 392, for all you Ecoboost is better than a V8 folks.

 

[da_jokker]

Thanks...still seems impossible to get the same mpg for both. So either they are guessing, or the city is really crap and the STart/Stop is raising it to 17.

 

[RPF]

Something seems fishy with the dates on this one. Window sticker generated on May 10, which would imply a build date of May 17 since the stickers generate 7 days before the build day. But then there was the shutdown during that time which meant that it couldn't be built that day. This seems to be confirmed by the date up in the metadata with the blend number. It seems to indicate that it will roll down the line as blend 6955 on June 2nd. The 5/31 date at bottom center is the date the .pdf of the window sticker was generated on access.

Unless there is a railcar number to confirm that it has shipped, I think the "in transit" status on this one is in error.

 

[Mcfly]

Has anyone heard if the 2dr 2.7 SAS (2dr WT as an example) gets slightly better MPG? I know the 2 dr Wrangler JL bests it’s 4 dr big brother by 2 mpg on the highway.
ive seen these 17/17/17 figures before, but they were for the 4 dr 2.7 SAS, not the 2 dr.

 

[Compta38]

Another MIC not going to a paying customer...

You know there are MICs that don't make the quality cut for some reason, right?

 

[Razorbak86]

Something seems fishy with the dates on this one. Window sticker generated on May 10, which would imply a build date of May 17 since the stickers generate 7 days before the build day. But then there was the shutdown during that time which meant that it couldn't be built that day. This seems to be confirmed by the date up in the metadata with the blend number. It seems to indicate that it will roll down the line as blend 6955 on June 2nd. The 5/31 date at bottom center is the date the .pdf of the window sticker was generated on access.

Unless there is a railcar number to confirm that it has shipped, I think the "in transit" status on this one is in error.

Sponsored