Sponsored

2.7L, or 2.3L. Help me make the right decision.

Deleted member 9326

Guest
2.3 stick for me all day, until I trade-up for the BEV model in a couple of years.
- I hate autos
- I want to chill and enjoy the Bronco, not drag race with stress-heads on the freeway
- I dislike driving over-powered top-heavy cars on the curves (yay, understeer)
- The 2.3 will feel like a rocket compared to my 22R pickup :)
- Feels risky buying a new ICE car at this moment in time so going low (base 2.3 manual)
 

Tony Sorrento

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
70
Reaction score
212
Location
West Falls, New York
Website
www.westherr.com
Vehicle(s)
2023 F-150 Powerboost
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
I'm not spending $50,000+ on a Bronco and not maxing it out ... to save a few thousand? No chance ... 2.7 was always in the cards for me ... and I squatched it for the same reason. After doing all that on the Outerbanks, I was within a few hundred of a Wildtrak so I went Wildtrak .... I.Can't.WAIT!
 

VoltageDrop

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
1,414
Reaction score
3,953
Location
Fidalgo Island, WA
Vehicle(s)
23, 69 Bronco
Your Bronco Model
Base
Clubs
 
My F 150 crew has the 5.0 . I wish my Bronco would as well. Why does that matter you ask? Because a few weeks ago I ordered “seven” Motorcraft FL 500 oil filters from Walmart. Instead, they sent me “seven cases “( 12 filters per case) of the oil filters and charged me for only seven filters. I contacted them to correct the error and they said “ don’t worry about it”. The way I figure it, I can change the oil twice a year in my F 150 and I wont need to purchase an oil filter for the next 48 years. BTW, I’m getting the 2.7. ( see how I eventually tied my post into the topic).
Here's another option if you want to use up those filters!
Ford Bronco 2.7L, or 2.3L. Help me make the right decision. 2021-04-06 10_25_37-Window
 

Cliff

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
41
Reaction score
87
Location
Huntsville, Al
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Flex
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
All 2.3L goodness, but i think one-pedal or trail control (or both) are only available with the 2.7L... can anyone confirm?
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
Wanted33

Wanted33

Outer Banks
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
4,050
Reaction score
9,240
Location
Down south in Dixie
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT, 2019 Wrangler, 2020 Ranger
Your Bronco Model
Outer Banks
Clubs
 
Last edited:

Cliff

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
41
Reaction score
87
Location
Huntsville, Al
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Flex
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 

Cliff

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
41
Reaction score
87
Location
Huntsville, Al
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Flex
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
Main reasons I changed to the bigger 2.7 is WEIGHT.
  1. The BL is 489lbs heaver than the base.
  2. The 4 door adds 240lbs.
  3. A winch is another 100lbs.
  4. Overlanding = baggage (about 750lbs)
Also Engine Load:
  1. I live in Alabama so A/C will be on ALL the time.
  2. A trailer can add 1000's of lbs to pull around
  3. NONE of the Y.T. videos show a 2.3/Auto doing difficult trails.
CONS:
  1. The 2.7L adds 152lbs to the bronco
But consider this...
When you give your best friend (a jeep owner) a ride and you put the peddle down, what are they going to say?

2.3L (single turbo) = "Wow - that 2.3 has enough power - Cool!"​
2.7L (dual turbo) = "Holy Sh!#"​

GVWR-Details-with-Wildtrack-2048x1583.jpg
 

AZshot

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Threads
22
Messages
483
Reaction score
1,219
Location
Desert Southwest
Vehicle(s)
Vintage Motorcycles, F-150, various other
Your Bronco Model
Big Bend
Clubs
 
I look forward to the stick more than having a couple dozen more horsepower. And the Crawler Gear will be fine for "one pedal". You lift off the gas, you slow down to 1 MPH and then touch the brake if you want to. 2.3 for me.
 

hemiblas

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
Roger
Joined
Jul 19, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
2,435
Location
Aurora, Co
Vehicle(s)
17 mustang gt, 3 Wrangler JLs
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
If you are getting the stick...the 2.3 is the only choice and it is a good one. For auto....2.7 all the way!!!
 

Sponsored

flatlander40

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Threads
26
Messages
855
Reaction score
2,039
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
F150
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
I’m 2.3, but it’s part of my whole package that works for me and my budget.
 

dcmdon

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
208
Reaction score
297
Location
Metro-West Boston
Vehicle(s)
.
Your Bronco Model
Undecided
This is the way I look at it. And a lot of these points contradict themselves.

1) The 2.3L makes more power and torque than most V8s did 20 years ago. It will be fine.
2) With a tune, the 2.3L seems to really wake up. TFL's ranger went from about 7 sec 0-60 to less than 6 seconds.
3)***This is HUGE*** - the fuel economy a vehicle gets is more dependent on the vehicle than the engine. (unless you are comparing something like a gas vs diesel or hybrid) The largest impact on fuel economy has to do with how much power the engine has to make to move the vehicle. Not how much power the engine CAN make. Driven the same, the difference in fuel economy is going to be minimal because both engines have to make the same power to drive a given route.

Look at it this way. If the truck is driven 12k per year.
A V6 that gets 17 mpg will use 705 gallons of fuel.
An I4 that gets 20 mpg will use 600 gallons of fuel.

If you pay $2.50 per gallon, that is a difference of $262 per year. Nothing really. 72 cents per day

I think the bottom line is that an I4 is going to more than get the job done.
If you are someone who likes a "quick" car, get the V6 since other than the extra $1800 (a 3.5% premium) there isn't much down side.
 

dcmdon

Well-Known Member
First Name
Don
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
208
Reaction score
297
Location
Metro-West Boston
Vehicle(s)
.
Your Bronco Model
Undecided
One other thing. When I had my VW tuned, it was a reflash by APR. This is a company run by engineers. Its totally turn key, with factory levels of refinement and drivability.

When I had my Subaru STi tuned, it was much more of an "enthusiast" type situation. Tweaking and fiddling and refining.

There seems to be both kinds of situations available. 5 Star seems to make the most power but Gear Head seems to make a turn key solution that retains things like knock sensing. Probably most turn key.

Either way, if I just wanted a bit more power, I'd probably go the Gear Head route and never think about tuning again.
 

Cliff

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
41
Reaction score
87
Location
Huntsville, Al
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Flex
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
***This is HUGE*** - the fuel economy...
A V6 that gets 17 mpg will use 705 gallons of fuel.
An I4 that gets 20 mpg will use 600 gallons of fuel.
If you pay $2.50 per gallon, that is a difference of $262 per year. Nothing really. 72 cents per day
The Ford F150 XL 2.7 gets 19mpg city / 24mpg highway
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=43464

The 2021 Ranger 2.3 XLT gets 20 city / 24 highway (https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/43542.shtml)

So really its somewhere between 0 and 1 mpg difference... not so huge

This is the way I look at it. And a lot of these points contradict themselves.

1) The 2.3L makes more power and torque than most V8s did 20 years ago. It will be fine.
2) With a tune, the 2.3L seems to really wake up. TFL's ranger went from about 7 sec 0-60 to less than 6 seconds.
I don't plan to put a V8 in the 2021 Bronco - I was comparing it to the 2.7L and if your willing to do an after market tune... the 2.7 can be tuned too.

The largest impact on fuel economy has to do with how much power the engine has to make to move the vehicle. Not how much power the engine CAN make. Driven the same, the difference in fuel economy is going to be minimal because both engines have to make the same power to drive a given route.
I think that justifies the 2.7L - If you add and extra 1500lbs of people and camping gear... the 2.3 will need to work harder to pull it down the trail than a 2.7. This (work harder) effort will tranlate two ways...
  1. Fuel economy
  2. Engine ware-n-tare
I think the bottom line is that an I4 is going to more than get the job done.
Totally agree!!! Until you start loading it down

If you are someone who likes a "quick" car, get the V6
Speed is not as big of a deal as capability. I want to add gear, a trailer, a wife, maybe a few friends... all that adds up to a lot of weight. If I expect to go up a hill with the A/C on... I just feel a 2.3 will be working TOO hard.
 

Cliff

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
41
Reaction score
87
Location
Huntsville, Al
Vehicle(s)
2014 Ford Flex
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
After all the research... I think there are only two reasons to get the 2.3L
  1. Price
  2. Manual Transmission
Sponsored

 
 


Top