- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
- Threads
- 22
- Messages
- 483
- Reaction score
- 1,219
- Location
- Desert Southwest
- Vehicle(s)
- Vintage Motorcycles, F-150, various other
- Your Bronco Model
- Big Bend
Only time will tell if the 2.3 or 2.7 are more reliable long term. Saying one is "working harder" is subjective. Many old 4runners from the 80s and 90s are still running fine, and were about half the horsepower of these Broncos. I know, I had one, and I know what under powered is. I would have to shift down from overdrive going over a pass, to 4th. Sometimes in Colorado, down to 3rd! Thankfully, I had a stick. And I'll always prefer a stick to a hunting, shifting automatic that tries to figure out what gear based on my throttle pedal.
To me, long term reliability is what I want. My 4runner did 260,000 mi on the original clutch. My F-150 V8 5.4 is now at 240,000 and still going well, drive it every couple days. Screaming turbos, SpaceX level computers running transmissions, "drive by wire" cameras, all that junk is going to break. How well will a 2.7 Auto driven like a mad man last? Will it get 250,000 mi without a problem?
You're talking to a former aerospace engineer that worked on the Stealth and many other high tech programs. Sometimes low tech is better, sometimes low power lasts longer.
To me, long term reliability is what I want. My 4runner did 260,000 mi on the original clutch. My F-150 V8 5.4 is now at 240,000 and still going well, drive it every couple days. Screaming turbos, SpaceX level computers running transmissions, "drive by wire" cameras, all that junk is going to break. How well will a 2.7 Auto driven like a mad man last? Will it get 250,000 mi without a problem?
You're talking to a former aerospace engineer that worked on the Stealth and many other high tech programs. Sometimes low tech is better, sometimes low power lasts longer.
Sponsored