2-Door Bronco Previewed to Dealers with Retro Styling, Removable Top and Doors

Husker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
89
Reaction score
80
Location
Nebraska
Vehicle(s)
Ford
Good, now go buy a Renegade or some other cute-ute and leave the Bronco for those of us who want a serious machine and not just another "me-too" grocery-getter, life-style vehicle.
We visit our kids serval times a year that live up in the mountains of Colorado...I happen to have a couple vehicles that do just fine off the beaten path, including side-by-sides for fun in the snow or whenever, Great family fun for the kids and the grandkids!
Even one of my Wife’s Subaru’s does remarkably well off the beaten path. Please don’t preach to me or suggest what I should or should not do with my money. Thank-U!
 

BroncoMike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
566
Reaction score
813
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
'71 Bronco, '02 Excursion
We visit our kids serval times a year that live up in the mountains of Colorado...I happen to have a couple vehicles that do just fine off the beaten path, including side-by-sides for fun in the snow or whenever, Great family fun for the kids and the grandkids!
Even one of my Wife’s Subaru’s does remarkably well off the beaten path. Please don’t preach to me or suggest what I should or should not do with my money. Thank-U!
Well, you DID say you were "out" if it had a solid axle - so by your own statement, that covers what you should not do with your money. NM is probably just trying to be helpful with suggestions on what to do with all the money you save... well, that, and move up in line when the order banks open.

Having driven solid-axle vehicles a good portion of my life - daily commuters and cross-country vacation wagons - there isn't a single thing that intimidates me about buying a new one if the opportunity presents itself. The problem with ride quality is that it is so subjective - each person has his or her preferences. A friend of mine traded in her '18 Rubicon for a '19 JL Moab - she can't stand how soft and plush the ride is on the new machine. Jeep made substantial changes to things under the JL, and it works impeccably. No, it doesn't ride like an Explorer, but holy crap - it's good, worlds better than the JK. My guess is IF Ford decides to do a solid axle, the JL ride will be their metric to beat. And the causal buyer - the type you describe in your other post - most won't know the difference between a solid axle and independent, nor care unless it drives remarkably poorly on their test ride.

If you haven't yet, take a moment to stop by a Jeep dealership and drive a JL. I think you'll be pretty much amazed at the ride quality, it may change your mind on what to think of a Bronco *if* they decide to equip it with solid axles. Better yet, we could all stop speculating (myself included) and wait until the Bronco comes out and judge based on how it actually rides on whatever they bolt underneath it!
 

Stampede.Offroad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
1,763
Location
SD
Vehicle(s)
junk
There are advantages and disadvantages to each, but I think Ford already picked the mechanical architecture out long ago; as well as what engines and transmissions will be available for the first couple years of production.

Most Anticipated Bronco Info You Need To Know

If we took OCT 2020 as a theoretical production/delivery start, that puts us just over 18 months away -- maybe they could change what colors of paint will be available, some interior finish materials, tire models, or something else small and interchangeable -- but whether the axles will be straight or independent ... too late. Even the little stuff needs specifications fixed and orders placed months in advance. Most of Ford's suppliers aren't just sitting around twiddling their thumbs with production lines idle and waiting for Bronco parts orders.

At this point the delay and secrecy isn't helping Ford build hype/anticipation, it's just souring the mood among people who are very eager for some version of the Bronco to arrive. I would bet that they're eager now to dose out the info in ways that are strategically advantageous to future sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAG

BroncoMike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
566
Reaction score
813
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
'71 Bronco, '02 Excursion
Apologies, I incorrectly used the future tense as if they hadn't made that decision yet. Clearly such isn't the case; there were technical drawings and RFPs sent out quite some time ago, contracts negotiated and awarded, deliverables agreed upon, tranches and schedules printed, third-tier suppliers consulted, etc. Absent a second (more likely third) year production change, what's going underneath is largely a done deal at this point.

I trust their marketing people have an ideal curve for announcement, teasers, release, and on-sale schedules, but certain variables change the math - witness the begining of the publicity, when UAW spilled the beans before marketing would have liked.

Since too many of us have the attention span of a seven-year old, when the shiny new car hits the dealerships, all will be fogotten or forgiven if the product meets or exceeds individual expectations.
 

JAG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
85
Reaction score
89
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2015 F150
I just hope Ford has some surprise options like user controlled MagneRide or limited slips with an e-locker.
 
Last edited:

Jimmy

Active Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Messages
40
Reaction score
58
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
Corvette, 370Z, Frontier
I just hope Ford has some surprise options like user controlled MagneRide or limited slips with an e-locker.
Considering the electronic rear axle lockers are common options for the F-150 (3.55/3.73) and the new Ranger I do not believe the new Bronco will be without.
 

OX1

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
517
Reaction score
405
Location
jackson nj
Vehicle(s)
59 Bird, 70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos, 86 Capri 5.0, 14 Stang GT, 17 Fusion Sport
It seems to me that most people who talk down TTB/TIB are people who drove a vehicle with worn out/crappy parts and/or poor geometry (usually due to modifications) and were too dumb/lazy/or cheap to fix their problems. A properly maintained/setup twin beam suspension is not going to handle like a Ferrari or necessarily ride like an old school Caddy, but they certainly aren't the ill-handling widow-makers or tire destroyers people like to make them out to be.
How many brand new coil spring TTB's have you owned. I had 2, and they were horrible from the get go.
Alignment is a disaster and many times changes, just from backing up. Forget getting down the road
with a lot of weight in the rear. Massive toe changes.

The only one that seemed decent was a 95 4WD F250 I had, but that was D50
(D60 hubs and brakes) with leaf, so susp couldn't travel enough to cause all the normal problems. It
did ride substantially better than comparable F350. Since it was my tow rig at the time,
I didn't care much how it was offroad.
 

JAG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
85
Reaction score
89
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2015 F150
Considering the electronic rear axle lockers are common options for the F-150 (3.55/3.73) and the new Ranger I do not believe the new Bronco will be without.
I have an F-150 with the e-locks, problem is, it’s not limited slip when the locks aren’t engaged, in winter weather conditions, this is a bitch 9 times out of 10.
 
Last edited:

BroncoRevital

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
293
Reaction score
473
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
Toyota Tacoma, past; 94 FB, 86 FB, 84 Bronco2
And what "mistakes" would these be exactly? Twin Traction beam axles had a production span of 17 years and over 1 million vehicles, and the Twin I-Beam (the two wheel drive suspension counterpart) has been produced for over 50 years and is still available in two wheel drive F250 and F350s.

Yes, twin beam suspensions have their quirks, but are definitely viable. They are the kings of cheap and easy wheel travel and are still popular today in the desert running/racing community. The TTB also provides trail performance very similar to a solid axle and is very simple and easy to modify.

It seems to me that most people who talk down TTB/TIB are people who drove a vehicle with worn out/crappy parts and/or poor geometry (usually due to modifications) and were too dumb/lazy/or cheap to fix their problems. A properly maintained/setup twin beam suspension is not going to handle like a Ferrari or necessarily ride like an old school Caddy, but they certainly aren't the ill-handling widow-makers or tire destroyers people like to make them out to be.
Your first statement is all I'm referring to. I never said they were bad or not viable. I had three Bronco's with them and they were fine for how I used them. My one complaint was how often I had to make alignment adjustments. Maybe I was cheap and call me lazy if you want but a solid axle would have made that issue easier and cheaper to deal with.
It was a great idea and worked great as daily driver but for a trail rig ( not desert racing ) I feel the consensus was it would have been better to just have a solid axles.
I feel like they tried too hard to make a compromising system that just would have worked better for off-road tails with the old tried and true. I guess "mistakes" was the wrong word to use. Didn't mean to trigger anyone.
 

JAG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
85
Reaction score
89
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2015 F150
Your first statement is all I'm referring to. I never said they were bad or not viable. I had three Bronco's with them and they were fine for how I used them. My one complaint was how often I had to make alignment adjustments. Maybe I was cheap and call me lazy if you want but a solid axle would have made that issue easier and cheaper to deal with.
It was a great idea and worked great as daily driver but for a trail rig ( not desert racing ) I feel the consensus was it would have been better to just have a solid axles.
I feel like they tried too hard to make a compromising system that just would have worked better for off-road tails with the old tried and true. I guess "mistakes" was the wrong word to use. Didn't mean to trigger anyone.
I think all NM is trying to say is a dialed in TTB was a pretty nice thing.

You had three Broncos with TTB that were lackluster, that’s all that really needs to be said. The last Bronco was produced 20+ years ago, if you think they can’t improve the technology over 20+ years, then you shouldn’t have any interest in what’s being produced.

I think some are getting to spun around the axle :P
 

Jimmy

Active Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Messages
40
Reaction score
58
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
Corvette, 370Z, Frontier
I have an F-150 with the e-locks, problem is, it’s not limited slip when the locks aren’t engaged, in winter weather conditions, this is a bitch 9 times out of 10.
I Understand... Unless a 4wd is IN 4wd it is not doing much unless there is a mechanical locker like GM or Dodge/Jeep. Former NEO guy, 3x there in my existence. Plenty of icy driving on 480-271...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAG

JAG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
85
Reaction score
89
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2015 F150
I Understand... Unless a 4wd is IN 4wd it is not doing much unless there is a mechanical locker like GM or Dodge/Jeep. Former NEO guy, 3x there in my existence. Plenty of icy driving on 480-271...
Preach! I grew up in Grand Lake area on an 83 Cutlass without Posi, didn’t know what traction was until I was already a man, by then it was confusing. ;)
 

007-FJC

Member
First Name
Mo
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
22
Reaction score
28
Location
Modesto, CA
Vehicle(s)
Toyota FJ Cruiser, Toyota 4Runner, Lexus LS, Peterbilt, V8 Cressida
If you consider roads to campgrounds and picnic areas "offroad" then perhaps you might be correct. I kid you not, I can count the number of FJ Cruisers, 4Runners (current gen models), Tacomas, Raptors, and H3s I have ever seen on actual offroad trails on my two hands, and I run trails multiple times a month and attend some large offroad events. The H3 and FJ Cruiser were probably the closest competitors to the Wrangler in decades (especially the adventure package H3 which included front & rear lockers as well as a 4:1 tranfercase), but they frankly still weren't in the same league of offroad capability as the Wrangler and were both sales failures compared to the Wrangler.

I have yet to see a Raptor offroad, and I live in the desert. They are too big and expensive to really be practical on trails. I guess if you just want to drive really fast on power line roads through the desert that you could navigate in a Camry at more prudent speeds, then the Raptor is the perfect vehicle for you. I have seen a lot of Raptors commuting around town though, so I suppose it is the image that sells. I am not necessarily knocking the capability of the Raptor, because it too is an offroad vehicle that is completely in a class of its own, but few people have the desire, skill, or location to use a Raptor as it was designed to be used.
LOL I've owned 4Runners and still do and I own a FJ. Don't kid yourself, Toyotas have earned their hardcore offroad creds. You really have no idea what you're talking about. The FJ Cruiser and 5th gen 4Runner debuted crossing the Rubicon trail! Youtube is literally flooded with brand new 4Runners doing awesome hard core trails! You really should keep your opinions to yourself since you really have no idea what you're talking about. Just because you personally haven't seen it doesn't mean they're not popular offroad. Come to California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado and you'll see these in full force doing what they're designed to do. Look at Australia where 4x4 is life and necessary driving plenty of Land Cruisers, Prados, Hilux's, Rangers and other IFS trucks predominantly off-road. Now allow me to school you with some footage of IFS Toyotas laughing at your statement. SFA isn't Necessary at all.

Heres a 4th gen 4Runner and a 3rd gen Taco running "picnic" rubicon trail

Lightly modded 5th gen 4Runner on the Rubicon

A FJ, 2 3rd gen 4Runners picnicing on boulders

Heres a couple of FJs boulder bashing in the rubicon

A bunch of FJs and a 5th gen 4Runner in Moab

Heres an unmodified suspension Land Cruiser Prado which we get in the USA as a Lexus GX doing some picnic trails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltYbEg-bryw

Heres a big 8 seater Land Cruiser 100 back to back with a solid axle swapped taco with tons of tractions not giving an F
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hORPtI9C12g

The big daddy Land Cruiser 200 yanking a trailer offroad through an intercontinental trip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgeMcCDLzU

If you need more proof, Youtube it yourself.
 

007-FJC

Member
First Name
Mo
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
22
Reaction score
28
Location
Modesto, CA
Vehicle(s)
Toyota FJ Cruiser, Toyota 4Runner, Lexus LS, Peterbilt, V8 Cressida
They sure sell a lot of those trucks that are a "chore" to drive. And with as many as I see at the mall, commuting, and on vacations far from their home zip code, it appears their "single purpose" is whatever the driver wants to do with them.

Have you driven a JL? Do we think Ford can't do a solid axle as well as Jeep? Jeep manages to sell every unit they assemble, and they don't apologize for handling or ride quality.

I won't shed a single tear if the Bronco winds up with IFS (I'll mostly just chuckle and move on)... but that will be the litmus test of who Ford wants to sell to.
I test drove a JLU Sahara when they first came out and I can tell you its a chore. For $50,000, you get to rub shoulder to shoulder with the salesman in the passenger seat in a stripped down interior that doesn't have $50,000 worth of sound deadening. Over rough pavement, the front solid axle gets skittish and thats lively on its own. The fact that they can get away with selling one of those rigs for $50k large is baffling and the people that buy Wranglers and 4Runners are mostly posers who want cool looking trucks that want to look the part and this is the same for people that buy pickups.

Ford does just fine with their F series trucks with solid axles so I think they can pull it off just fine. How hard is it to make a rigid axle move worund with some control arms holding it? In the end it costs a ton of money to get a quality lift with great characteristics in both a Solid or Independant axle setup. If someone really wanted a SFA Bronco, instead of dumping money in a IFS, they can go to a reputable shop and have a SFA swap done for a few pennies more.

Here's pictures from a trip I did with a friend and his family in their new Jeep Wrangler and we switched trucks often. The first thing they said after jumping out of my truck is how beautifully it rides off-road. I can second that because getting tossed around in a Wrangler does get pretty old. Its pretty funny when you have someone get out of a Jeep to envy your Toyota and he sure as hell loved it.

HECTOhq.jpg


The little jeep lifted tires and dragged its undercarriage over everything as we worked to throw rocks to fill holes.

IeyMmv0.jpg


RGkEbfo.jpg


And of course the obligatory cool Bronco pic. Look how tiny the JKU looks as its dwarfed by the big trucks lol.

zKJtX2g.jpg


In the end, the stock JKU with SFA didn't keep up with a 3" lifted FJ with IFS and my friend decided to abort as he was discouraged by his $45,000 purchase getting beat up, dragged and bucked around off-road. So if you must go wheeling with any rig, you reach its limitations quickly stock when following modded rigs through obstacles.
 

BroncoRevital

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
293
Reaction score
473
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
Toyota Tacoma, past; 94 FB, 86 FB, 84 Bronco2
I think all NM is trying to say is a dialed in TTB was a pretty nice thing.

You had three Broncos with TTB that were lackluster, that’s all that really needs to be said. The last Bronco was produced 20+ years ago, if you think they can’t improve the technology over 20+ years, then you shouldn’t have any interest in what’s being produced.

I think some are getting to spun around the axle :p
And all I’m saying is that a solid axle gets more from less.
I’m not trying to shit on TTB’s. I’m well aware of what they can do and I’m a die hard Bronco fan of ones that have it.

You calling my axles “lackluster” proves my point though. Out the box a solid axle is just better and easier when it comes to off-road.

I’m all for Ford surprising me with a great IFS. Like I said it’s no deal breaker for me. I have one now and like others have just shown Toyota’s IFS are very capable.
 

Top