Until it reaches $5/gal.I DON'T CARE ABOUT GAS, IT"S A WRITEOFF....
Sponsored
Until it reaches $5/gal.I DON'T CARE ABOUT GAS, IT"S A WRITEOFF....
I was going to say, 35s really aren’t that big, my little 37s look relatively dinky when you start getting onto trails where the average tire size is 40-42”(ie ruts).Try jumping out of a full-size bronco on 44's
These Broncos are cool but not lifted to go
If you think 35 are big your not buying the right vehicle
Go out and buy your self a Honda Pilot or a Prius
Did you know that facetious has all of the standard vowels of the English language in order?You obviously missed the point.
Those are some big words coming from a Squatch. I'm impressed!! All jokes aside, I appreciate the factoid about the word 'facetious'. I learned something today. Thanks!!Did you know that facetious has all of the standard vowels of the English language in order?
I assumed that you were not actually going to ask your Bronco to drive a 300 mile round-trip and do the fun stuff. However, you predicated your argument on ambiguity and I took the more hilarious supposition.
I'm pretty sure that the new Bronco will have as high of a MPG rating as Ford can get it. Go tall gears and short tires if you want to maximize it, but I'm not certain it will make a huge financial difference.
Facetiously. Don’t forget Y.Did you know that facetious has all of the standard vowels of the English language in order?
I assumed that you were not actually going to ask your Bronco to drive a 300 mile round-trip and do the fun stuff. However, you predicated your argument on ambiguity and I took the more hilarious supposition.
I'm pretty sure that the new Bronco will have as high of a MPG rating as Ford can get it. Go tall gears and short tires if you want to maximize it, but I'm not certain it will make a huge financial difference.
Same except mine is a 1990 on 33x12.50s!Seeing this makes me very happy I have my '88 sitting on 33s.
mine on 31's
Same except mine is a 1990 on 33x12.50s!
Me, I am going for 37" once the factory 35" wear out. Range is important to me as well. Although large rolling mass requires more grunt to get up and going the larger diameter tire on the highway can balance out the wind resistance of a good lift when properly geared. I think I will be getting 18-20 mpg freeway. IMHOI'll be rolling on 33s.
A quick Google search shows the 1994 Bronco with a 351W put out 210 horsepower. That's laughable by today's standards. I hope that little 2.7 will impress, although I don't expect it will sound all that cool in the process.Can I get the one on the right? Bet it has a V8... maybe even a 351
Yes, true... 210 hp, 324 lb. ft. of torque. mated to a 3 speed auto w/OD. And yet it NEVER had any issues towing anything.A quick Google search shows the 1994 Bronco with a 351W put out 210 horsepower. That's laughable by today's standards. I hope that little 2.7 will impress, although I don't expect it will sound all that cool in the process.
Right? Dang...So where does this put me with my 33s
I just paid $4.20 a gallon todayUntil it reaches $5/gal.
Barely...Not to mention gas mileage...
Same argument with twin turbo 6 vs naturally aspirated 8. If I turboed or S/C'd that same V8... um take your 6 and kick rocks homie haha. Or if you were to mate an old engine to a new transmission. Same concept.Yes, true... 210 hp, 324 lb. ft. of torque. mated to a 3 speed auto w/OD. And yet it NEVER had any issues towing anything.
With that said, we'll see what this 2.7 can do. But you still can't compare a new engine to one that is 26 years old, because that same 351 (if still built today), would probably easily push out 400 hp and 500 lb. ft. of torque.