- Thread starter
- #31
I guess I stand corrected
Sponsored
I guess I stand corrected
I'm guessing 90% of the poll voters, should not have voted.Could not vote. I could not have the Bronco as my only vehicle. My work commute is too long and too many miles. The fuel consumption is too much. The Bronco would have to be a weekend or fun vehicle with limited use.
It’s not the same exact 2.7 the other vehicles get, a couple of the components are different…
Yeah, if I can put 256k miles and counting fast on a VW with only wear and tear shop visits and DIY general maintenance, I feel pretty confident in a Ford proudct.Bottom 10 manufacturers – least reliable engines
Manufacturer Failure Rate 1 MG Rover 1 in 13 2 Audi 1 in 27 3 MINI 1 in 40 4 Saab 1 in 40 5 Vauxhall 1 in 41 6 Peugeot 1 in 44 7 BMW 1 in 45 8 Renault 1 in 46 9 Volkswagen 1 in 52 10 Mitsubishi 1 in 59
I bought my Honda fit 12 years ago after graduating college. I babied it for the first 5-7 years but have just abused it for the last 5 or so. It has 138k miles and the only engine issues I've had is a clicking sound and I had to replace a coil pack. Other than that it's never given me any issuesTop 10 manufacturers – most reliable engines
Manufacturer Failure Rate 1 Honda 1 in 344 2 Toyota 1 in 171 3 Mercedes-Benz 1 in 119 4 Volvo 1 in 111 5 Jaguar 1 in 103 6 Lexus 1 in 101 7 Fiat 1 in 85 8 Ford 1 in 80 9 Nissan 1 in 76 10 Land Rover 1 in 72
I always figured Toyota was the standard bearer….Now I’m thinking Honda should design and build a badass off roader
That looks like a whole lotta fun
Given the nature of the reported 2.7L failures, the engines will generally fail under warranty so right now I'm not worried about it. It's my only vehicle these days because the used market is so strong that I sold my other vehicles. My concern isn't the engine, it's the windshields. I cracked my first one at 300 miles and it took 2 months to get replaced. They're upright and I get the feeling I'm going to be replacing the at least once every 2 years.I am a helicopter pilot, so by nature I live with the idea that something mechanical is going to fail on me and leave me stranded. The question is….Is the probability higher than what I have right now. F150 with 5.0L, no issues, still under 50k miles on it.
I do not live in fear, but live in probabilities of risk…..Is the juice worth the squeeze. If the probability of having a catastrophic failure of the 2.7 is higher than my 5.0 and the ability to get it fixed afterwards is an issue with long delays, then I wait for my base model and keep my truck. If it is less likely to have issues, then I trade my truck for a higher trim that is available.
The hesitation comes from reliability issues such as engines failing, electrical gremlins, etc….Of course you never hear the good on these forums, only the bad….So it is hard to wade thru these waters sometimes….
Not sure what you're talking about. The handling is good on my bronco, it's not noisy at all, the stopping is good and the comfort is fantastic. The only issue is the terrible gas mileage (17mpg at 4,300 miles).I think a Bronco would be a terrible “only”...but not because of the 2.7...big, tall, noisy, heavy... = poor handling, poor stopping, terrible gas mileage, uncomfortable...but if those things are ok with ya (I daily drove a cj2, cj7, and many trucks) Ford has no worse reliability than most other manufacturer...