Bronco Ford Performance Power Packs on the way for more HP and Torque

[Razorback]

Tire size wouldn't be compatible with Sasquatch?

Sponsored

 

[Gamecock]

It'll be interesting what they do with the 2.7...since it seems to be against their limits for the transmission already.

 

[Bird Dog Off Road]

Tire size wouldn't be compatible with Sasquatch?

I would hope the Bronco version would since they come from the factory with them.

 

[Ttp2017]

That’s awesome, I much rather have this from Ford than any other random aftermarket tune!

 

[Laminar]

It'll be interesting what they do with the 2.7...since it seems to be against their limits for the transmission already.

People still believe this?

 

[Lab00Rat]

Not going to believe it till I see it in the real.

The transmission is already close to it's limit with the 35" tire and 2.7L torque specs.


Please tell me this is a joke...

Compare pre and post boost using the same 93 octane gas before I believe any improvement numbers.

False comparison! Changing two variables at the same time to maximize the difference is misleading.

 

[Gamecock]

People still believe this?

Believe what? have you seen the torque specs on the 2.7l? Have you seen the published torque limit on the 10R60? What is there to believe or not believe?

 

[AZSky]

If only I can pay the dealer with my Customer Satisfaction Fund..

 

[The Memedalorian]

You know what would be a fun increased HP and torque option for the Bronco?

A 5.0L V8 COYOTE ENGINE.

 

[TopRecon]

Man, I was really on the fence about getting a 2.7 given some of the reliability stories I've heard, now that you can effectively get a 2.3 with the same warrantied power, is there any reason to get a V6? Especially if the transmission will be a bottleneck.

 

[Rpm]

Man, I was really on the fence about getting a 2.7 given some of the reliability stories I've heard, now that you can effectively get a 2.3 with the same warrantied power, is there any reason to get a V6? Especially if the transmission will be a bottleneck.

Yeah, wouldn't bother for 0.4 litres.

 

[DFNMAN]

Not going to believe it till I see it in the real.

The transmission is already close to it's limit with the 35" tire and 2.7L torque specs.


Please tell me this is a joke...

Compare pre and post boost using the same 93 octane gas before I believe any improvement numbers.

False comparison! Changing two variables at the same time to maximize the difference is misleading.

Nice catch, I missed that.

 

[vrtical]

I had one on my new 17 Mustang from Roush and it was pretty darn good, I just took that tune off last year.

 

[DFNMAN]

Man, I was really on the fence about getting a 2.7 given some of the reliability stories I've heard, now that you can effectively get a 2.3 with the same warrantied power, is there any reason to get a V6? Especially if the transmission will be a bottleneck.

the 2.3 horror stories will start coming in around 50k miles.

Sponsored