They sold 77,000 of them last year vs. 201,000 Wranglers.Any idea how many Gladiators are produced a year?
Yep I would love there to be 2 rangers. The ugly ranger( for 2wd, fuel miser, fleet, and comercial sales) and the Bronco Ranger that uses Bronco type sheetmetal, is available in 2 and 4 doors, and has higher end 4x4 suspension. Also make the 2 door Bronco Ranger Base come in at around 26-27,000. Squatch available across the board. If the next Ranger(after the new one) has the back half of the sheetmetal more resemble the Bronco sides then having 2 front ends wouldnt be that bad to differentiate them. The aero one being for mpg sales and the tough one being for enthusiasts.Just move the ranger under the bronco line. It is perfect as the bronco and ranger will share basic platforms. At most offer a sasquatch ranger package.
please and thank you.
Gotta take out Wranger once and for all!This is the top secret Bronco mobile rocket launcher
Who believes it will? They're not going to pull a RAM and make it a brand. It's a sub-brand in the way that F-series is a sub-brand, but still a Ford.I don't disagree with you, but if the Bronco brand segregates from Ford as we believe it will. Then Ford will essentially have what GM has between the Chevy Colorado and the GMC Canyon.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if they brand the Maverick under the Bronco umbrella.
Just because FCA did a crap job with the Gladiator doesn't mean that Ford will do the same. Just look at the different styling between the Wrangler and Bronco and one can imagine it looking waaaay better than the Gladiator does.Ford, please no. Just stop it. Why? Let Jeep do their own thing with the Gladiator. The Gladiator sucks and is ugly. Ford has the Ranger and the F-Series trucks. I don't get it. It's basically going to be a Ranger with a different body and sucky bed space. Just buy an F150 because they're priced too close to even consider a Ranger (or Maverick) for that matter.