I would appreciate a higher tow rating. That's one of the reasons I bought my Ranger ahead of the Bronco. Got work to do!
Sponsored
I think it'll be over 60k. My Ranger Tremor Lariat (fully loaded) was $49K MSRP.This will stay up forever and hold me to it. If a Ranger Raptor is an option, and itās not a 60k dollar truck, Iām first in line. Iād LOVE a ranger raptor, but once you hit 60k for a midsize pickup Iāll pass. Iāll keep my 44k dollar Sasquatch bronco.
probably start at upper 50's maybe 60.I think it'll be over 60k. My Ranger Tremor Lariat (fully loaded) was $49K MSRP.
I believe thatās the biggest trailer behind a bronco Iāve seen yet.
And yet the poor FE owners can't even get their FE w/ the Ford OEM tow package due to GVWR. Makes zero sense as I'm sure the Raptor will have a higher curb weight.Now, if the Bronco Raptor has a higher tow capacity than the "standard" Bronco, all those comments from others that more offroadability means lower tow rating would be completely meaningless.
Says the infamous "Florida Man"I cannot believe anyone from the GREAT STATE OF MICHIGAN would go to OHIO for ANY reason, let alone, Columbus, Ohio.
Round on the Edges, Hi in the middle, that's the RATHOLE south of Michigan.
It will have a beefier frame, different engine, and a long travel suspension and be wider. Should have relatively unique interior tooBesides price, what is supposed to be different about the Raptor?
Sorry if this has been answered before, but since B&P's prices are up higher than before, will the prices quoted originally be honored, or no?
Being the Bronco is an SUV and the F-150 is a truck why do you think Ford would have an issue pricing them similarly or pricing the Bronco above the F150. The off-road "high performance" market seems to be very robust now. If Ford uses the 3.5TT from the Raptor truck why would they not price it similar to how Dodge prices the Ram TRX and Durango Hellcat (same engine); were the SUV costs more.probably start at upper 50's maybe 60.
the f150 raptor is 64k, not much room over 60k before the 2 are on top of each other.
Of course thats relatively stripped. you can add the 10k luxury package to the f150.
I think he is talking about the Ranger Raptor not being on top of the F-150 Raptor.Being the Bronco is an SUV and the F-150 is a truck why do you think Ford would have an issue pricing them similarly or pricing the Bronco above the F150. The off-road "high performance" market seems to be very robust now. If Ford uses the 3.5TT from the Raptor truck why would they not price it similar to how Dodge prices the Ram TRX and Durango Hellcat (same engine); were the SUV costs more.