Downsizing from 35" stock sasquatch tires to 33'' later?

[Corsair]

It will be interesting to see how it mounts. I can tell you my current rack on my Explorer is not something you would want to take on and off to get in your garage.

Nor the one on my Escape. One on the Bronco seems like it’d take 5-10 minutes.

Sponsored

 

[brunjc2]

Couldn't find a thread on this and I can't be the only one thinking about future costs owning the bronco. I was wondering, 35's are going to look bad ass and all, but realistically replacing them with more 35's is gonna be a bit pricey and I'm wondering about when the time comes to get new tires, switching to maybe 33's. My question is would this affect anything at all on the bronco like rpms, etc? I figure 33's will be less expensive, a smoother ride, better mpg etc etc.

I, too, have thought about this. I’m not worried about saving money on tires, but a decent ride quality without sacrificing much off road capability is the driving factor. Then, I just go back to the thought Ford has it mostly figured out, so maybe I shouldn’t mess about with it. I can only speculate.

If I do change the tire size, I’ll likely go to the 285/75R17. On average, only .5” smaller than the 315/70R17, but 10-12% lighter, and skinnier, which may help with MPG. Only problem here is that you’re limited to e load, which is fine for me, but may negate the benefits I was after.

here’s some links to (1) the 285/75R17 and (2) it’s 315/70R17 counterpart. Check the specs.


BFG All Terrain
285/75R17 E load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...reModel=All-Terrain+T/A+KO2&partnum=875SR7KO2
315/70R17 C load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires....dewall=Blackwall&partnum=17SR7KO2V2&tab=Sizes


Cooper Discoverer A/T3
285/75R17 E Load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires....SR7DAXLT&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes
315/75R17 E Load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires....White+Letters&partnum=17SR7DAXLTRWL&tab=Sizes


BFG Mud Terrain KM3
285/75R17 E Load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires....75QR7KM3&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes
315/70R17 E Load
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires....sidewall=Blackwall&partnum=17QR7KM3&tab=Sizes


So what I will do? Probably just drive it and enjoy it as is.

 

[Garemlin]

It will be interesting to see how it mounts. I can tell you my current rack on my Explorer is not something you would want to take on and off to get in your garage.

Fast forward to 1:35

 

[Mattwings]

Fast forward to 1:35

Very cool, never watched that one. Still not something I would want to do regularly, but not horrible.

 

[96ExplorerSport]

That height includes the rack.

78.9" on the 2dr squatch includes the rack?!
Good to know, thank you. I guess thats what they mean by MAX height?

 

[Ramble_Offroad]

If this is a question for anyone out there I’d recommend that y’all step back and reconsider your vehicle use plan.

Translation: Don’t buy the Sasquatch package for looks.

I’ve got no beef with anyone’s personal plan for their Bronco, but let’s be honest with ourselves. If you have no plans to take your Bronco off-road or have concerns about MPG & tire replacement costs then maybe the Sasquatch package or Wildtrack trim isn’t the right choice for you. Just sayin, most stock SUV’s on 33’s Lare far more capable than the average consumer realizes.

Ok....stepping off my soap box now. Please return to your previously scheduled programming.

PEACE

 

[CPL_Rabbit]

If this is a question for anyone out there I’d recommend that y’all step back and reconsider your vehicle use plan.

Translation: Don’t buy the Sasquatch package for looks.

I’ve got no beef with anyone’s personal plan for their Bronco, but let’s be honest with ourselves. If you have no plans to take your Bronco off-road or have concerns about MPG & tire replacement costs then maybe the Sasquatch package or Wildtrack trim isn’t the right choice for you. Just sayin, most stock SUV’s on 33’s Lare far more capable than the average consumer realizes.

Ok....stepping off my soap box now. Please return to your previously scheduled programming.

PEACE

Counterpoint: The Base Sasquatch, especially with Manual, is a value and platform combination we probably won't see again. If there's even a chance you might want to use lockers down the line, the Base Squatch makes perfect sense. You'd be hard pressed to get that capability for near that cost down the road.

 

[Ramble_Offroad]

Counterpoint: The Base Sasquatch, especially with Manual, is a value and platform combination we probably won't see again. If there's even a chance you might want to use lockers down the line, the Base Squatch makes perfect sense. You'd be hard pressed to get that capability for near that cost down the road.

Maybe we have an misunderstanding. Base squatch is rad. Go for it. But don’t buy it if you think “maybe” you don’t need 315’s.

PEACE

 

[ZackDanger]

78.9" on the 2dr squatch includes the rack?!
Good to know, thank you. I guess thats what they mean by MAX height?

Yeah. That chart is weird and that includes the rack.... you can confirm because if it didn’t it would mean the Sasquatch is 4” taller than the badlands after accounting for tire diameter differences, and we know that’s not true.

 

[Southern Girl]

You will also be required to give up your Man Card.

I'm in trouble, then.

 

[VIRUS]

I'm in trouble, then.

You should be fine

 

[Southern Girl]

If this is a question for anyone out there I’d recommend that y’all step back and reconsider your vehicle use plan.

Translation: Don’t buy the Sasquatch package for looks.

I’ve got no beef with anyone’s personal plan for their Bronco, but let’s be honest with ourselves. If you have no plans to take your Bronco off-road or have concerns about MPG & tire replacement costs then maybe the Sasquatch package or Wildtrack trim isn’t the right choice for you. Just sayin, most stock SUV’s on 33’s Lare far more capable than the average consumer realizes.

Ok....stepping off my soap box now. Please return to your previously scheduled programming.

PEACE

I have concerns about those things with my current truck of 8 years, and I still upgraded to bigger tires. It's perfectly NORMAL AND FINE to be concerned about costs and mpg. If you don't consider these things, you aren't a serious person.

I don't understand why it's fine for people to discuss getting bigger tires, but if someone considers slightly smaller ones, suddenly "this is not for you" and "consider your vehicle use plan". Vehicle use plan?

I feel like this post is an attempt to get people to order something other than a Wildtrak so it won't be in such high demand.

 

[Ramble_Offroad]

I have concerns about those things with my current truck of 8 years, and I still upgraded to bigger tires. It's perfectly NORMAL AND FINE to be concerned about costs and mpg. If you don't consider these things, you aren't a serious person.

I don't understand why it's fine for people to discuss getting bigger tires, but if someone considers slightly smaller ones, suddenly "this is not for you" and "consider your vehicle use plan". Vehicle use plan?

I feel like this post is an attempt to get people to order something other than a Wildtrak so it won't be in such high demand.

Nope, I’m actually attempting to help people make good decisions. Take it for what it is.

PEACE.

 

[Southern Girl]

Nope, I’m actually attempting to help people make good decisions. Take it for what it is.

PEACE.

Well, he was asking about the difference between 33s and 35s, not asking if anyone thinks he needs to make a vehicle plan.

 

[Ramble_Offroad]

Well, he was asking about the difference between 33s and 35s, not asking if anyone thinks he needs to make a vehicle plan.

ok keyboard ninja. Let’s play.

IMPO he’s asking about “what happens if” someone buys a Sasquatch and then later decides to move back to a smaller tire. My good faith recommendation for this is don’t buy the Sasquatch package to start with.

and

33’s are still very capable

so, this is me attempting to give honest & supportive advice.

any questions?

PEACE

Sponsored