Sponsored

Driving at speed with 35" tires.

BruckinFonco

Base
Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
216
Reaction score
643
Location
Hoboken, NJ
Vehicle(s)
2017 VW GTI Sport MT, 1993 VW Corrado VR6 MT
Your Bronco Model
Base
Dammit, you're right. Now I need to reconsider the four door version.
Sponsored

 

JimmyDean

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
1,744
Reaction score
4,071
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
82 Bronco, 513 ci; 71 mach 1, 351C; 06 F-250, 6.0; 56 800, 172c.i. gas
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
my goal for my 82 is 54 MXTs
 

JimmyDean

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
1,744
Reaction score
4,071
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
82 Bronco, 513 ci; 71 mach 1, 351C; 06 F-250, 6.0; 56 800, 172c.i. gas
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Dammit, you're right. Now I need to reconsider the four door version.
don't. go 2dr. man, you can drive a 2dr on 44s with 15" rims on the interstate at 70 all day long. it really is not bad as long as you take care of bushings and bearings.
 

Cheshire

Banned
Base
Banned
Banned
First Name
Steven
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Threads
31
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
3,756
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
4Dr Bronco BaseSquatch 2.7L
Your Bronco Model
Base
What is it like driving at 55+ mph on 35" option tires as compared to 3 3 " all terrain tires?
Braking ability will be reduced as will gas mileage and acceleration.
 

2Jeeps&PatriotX1

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
3,233
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
'23 4dr Badsquatch, ‘05 LJ & ‘17 F150
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Braking ability will be reduced as will gas mileage and acceleration.
Wouldn't consider acceleration & mpg a big issue if going with the 2.7 though being the ecoboost. Not sure about the bronco brakes but on my f150, I upgraded to powerstop and it was noght & say difference.

My f150 with 6” lift, 35” MT (true mud terrains) and the 3.5EB gets better mpg (18.1mpg) than my wife’s grand cherokee with 32.5” AT tires and the 3.6 while in “aerodynamic” mode (16.9mpg). I drive 70-75mph in the truck and 65-70mph in her grand cherokee.
 

Sponsored

Mac n Nevada

Banned
Badlands
Banned
Banned
First Name
Michael
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
874
Reaction score
2,859
Location
Reno, Nv.
Vehicle(s)
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser/2019 Jeep GC Trailhawk
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
I never notice bigger tires at highway speeds , they ride fine with regular At's.....where i have noticed differences between 33's and 35's , is at slower speeds, driving around town. Nothing big enough not to get them ( the bigger tires), but it drives differently.

I like 33's.
 

Cheshire

Banned
Base
Banned
Banned
First Name
Steven
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Threads
31
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
3,756
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
4Dr Bronco BaseSquatch 2.7L
Your Bronco Model
Base
Wouldn't consider acceleration & mpg a big issue if going with the 2.7 though being the ecoboost. Not sure about the bronco brakes but on my f150, I upgraded to powerstop and it was noght & say difference.

My f150 with 6” lift, 35” MT (true mud terrains) and the 3.5EB gets better mpg (18.1mpg) than my wife’s grand cherokee with 32.5” AT tires and the 3.6 while in “aerodynamic” mode (16.9mpg). I drive 70-75mph in the truck and 65-70mph in her grand cherokee.
The 2.7L will definitely help with acceleration (mpg??), but won't do anything for braking. I wouldn't get Sasquatch 35s without the 2.7, but that's me. Your F150 mileage sounds good.
Sponsored

 
 


Top