I have 2 issue with taking the 2.3 just to get a manual. The 1st isn't relevant for this discussion so I'll skip to the 2nd, resale value. I understand buying a new vehicle isn't an investment and I'll lose money on it instantly so the only real question becomes how much will I lose. Because this is a brand new vehicle we just don't know and any guesses are just that, guesses. Ultimately I'm guessing the 2.7 will hold better value than the 2.3.Yeah, I’m happy and would probably still get the 2.3 even if the 2.7 was an option, and yes I wish it was an option. It’s not though, so take rate will be put up or shut up. You want the manual or not. If enough of us take the 2.3 manual, we might get the 2.7 manual option. If people flake out and don’t get the 2.3 manual, you can forget the 2.7 manual. I’m taking what they’re giving instead of shopping elsewhere.
Im not worried about the 2.3 though because proper gearing is more important than displacement. I’ve driven a properly geared 4cyl Tacoma long enough, plus an older Dodge Powerwagon that was 150hp but could pull stumps.
It’s up to you though, be part of the take rate, or work against it. It’s OK if you don’t get the manual, but then don’t complain later if the option is not expanded.
So am I willing to give extra money to Ford by going with the 2.3 manual in hopes they'll give me a 2.7 manual eventually? I don't know yet and fortunately I have time to think about it.
To me, it still just doesn't make sense that Ford paired the enthusiast transmission (manual) with the bottom tier motor instead of what is think is the enthusiast motor. Look at the enthusiast out there, they're the ones going 40's and bigger, more powerful engines.
Sponsored