- Thread starter
- #1
This is the link on the Bronco report from Fox News today.
https://www.foxnews.com/auto/bronco-popular-ford-buy-another-vehicle
https://www.foxnews.com/auto/bronco-popular-ford-buy-another-vehicle
Sponsored
Good. Ford needs all the negative press it can get for the mess it made much worse. You figured someone at Ford could have seen the continued supply issues coming earlier and dealt with it better. In early 22 this should have been dealt with.This is the link on the Bronco report from Fox News today.
https://www.foxnews.com/auto/bronco-popular-ford-buy-another-vehicle
The article looks accurate to me ... unless I'm missing something.Faux news
You are missing the point that 90% of reporter opinion on Fox is presented as fact.The article looks accurate to me ... unless I'm missing something.
mmmm. Is there something inaccurate in that article?You are missing the point that 90% of reporter opinion on Fox is presented as fact.
It's certainly not on the list of trusted news sources, and I avoid it like the plague. But being covered there will reach a large demographic.You are missing the point that 90% of reporter opinion on Fox is presented as fact.
No, it's "worth the wait". How you going to navigate the grocery store parking lot without Bronco, you're family will starve. You should all "stay pumped". (And I'm not just saying that because I own Ford stock.)Good. Ford needs all the negative press it can get for the mess it made much worse. You figured someone at Ford could have seen the continued supply issues coming earlier and dealt with it better. In early 22 this should have been dealt with.
Funny how the tool at ford calls people with orders "reservation holders" to make it seem like less of a commitment.
They are just plain incompetent.
Seems like you may live in a bubble. Newsflash, all the networks are propaganda, manufactured consent for their "side". Just sayin'.It's certainly not on the list of trusted news sources, and I avoid it like the plague. But being covered there will reach a large demographic.
The chances that this becomes a constructive debate are pretty much nil, but I have a few minutes to kill.Seems like you may live in a bubble. Newsflash, all the networks are propaganda, manufactured consent for their "side". Just sayin'.
yep the only ones I listen to less is CNN and MSNBC they are a bunch of wack jobs that make up there own truth not in factIt's certainly not on the list of trusted news sources, and I avoid it like the plague. But being covered there will reach a large demographic.
I won't argue their competencies but aren't we/weren't we just reservation holders? Nobody had a done deal until it was on the lot and there was never any issue with walking away. I don't know what else you would call it.Good. Ford needs all the negative press it can get for the mess it made much worse. You figured someone at Ford could have seen the continued supply issues coming earlier and dealt with it better. In early 22 this should have been dealt with.
Funny how the tool at ford calls people with orders "reservation holders" to make it seem like less of a commitment.
They are just plain incompetent.
you are kidding me right? Reuters and AP? LOLOLOLOL..The chances that this becomes a constructive debate are pretty much nil, but I have a few minutes to kill.
I try not to live in a bubble of my own biases. But that doesn't mean I need to seek out space in a bubble of proven misinformation. When their own defense of themselves is:
"No reasonable person" would believe what they say
-Tucker Carlson
Or even:
"A reasonable viewer would not conclude the statement implies an assertion of fact "
-Rachel Maddow
Then that's not a place to get information. There are plenty of sources that don't editorialize to the point of rage-porn and blatant lies. Rueters and AP to start.