Separate names with a comma.
I hear insulting people is a great way to sway their opinion in favor of the argument you're trying to make. You should try that some time.
I’m not sure that today confirms the SFA is out of the mix. The R is decidedly a desert runner. I like it a lot, but I can easily imagine Ford finding it profitable and good to offer a rock crawler trim as well.
At the same time, I don’t hear guys like TMG or ChrispyKC saying anything about SFA as even a remote possibility.
at this point I'll take a TTB. simply put, ime, IFS axles cannot stand up to the pain I put them through. But then again I've busted more 9" units than I can count as well.
One of the first posts ChispyKC made when he came here was claiming the Explorer and Ranger were being built on the same platform. I wouldn't exactly rank that as having a deep understanding of the inner workings of upcoming models.
There might be a few people from inside Ford or with some connections in our community, but none of them have established any kind of rock solid reputation as well informed on the inner workings or final details of Bronco.
When I saw the first Franken Ranger prototypes with IFS, my heart sank, but the fact that the rear suspension was hidden and not the front gave me hope that the IFS wasn't going to be the production piece. At the time I would have put the odds at 75% IFS, 25% solid.
Today when I saw the Bronco R sporting a production-based looking IFS, almost all hope has been extinguished. The statement that the rear suspension is "production-based," but no such statement specifically about the front suspension leaves me with the slightest glimmer of hope. Now I would place the odds at 99% IFS, 1% solid.
Just give up man, the dream is over. I will continue to follow the release of the Bronco, but at this point I am almost certain the Bronco will be a disappointment.
I remember when the mustang was finally getting IRS there were similar arguments on the stang forums too. I didn’t give bleep then and I don’t give a bleep now lol. Either configuration with meet my needs lol
That might be a pretty good analogy actually. Solid rear axle on the mustang is better for drag racing. Solid front axle is better for rock crawling. Because they are the way it's always been done, there is much more support for that method and it's seen as the way things should be. However, by changing to IRS or IFS respectively, they gain not only better road manners, but also a larger breadth of ability. The IRS mustang is FAR superior on a racetrack with corners and still can drag race, the IFS Bronco will be superior in offroad situations other than trying to crawl up the biggest rocks you can find at 3mph, but I'm sure it will still do it if not quite as well. That's in addition to the general livability improvements.
Admittedly, I'm sure the people who ONLY want their mustang to drag race and nothing else were rightfully disappointed and will have to stick with their old solid axle mustangs. For the people whose only metric they care about is slow speed rock crawling, they will probably find that the Bronco doesn't quite match up to a wrangler, though that remains to be seen.
For me, SFA would have been a dealbreaker because I like speed so I'm very happy. Apologies to the SFA purists.
I just think that people are seriously overestimating how much rock crawling ability the Bronco needs. The amount of people who “rock crawl” their brand new $45,000 rig is minuscule. If it can take on some hard, but not insanely difficult trails I’m sure it is gonna do well.
It's interesting how quickly you can change your opinion just to "be right" or on the cool kids/winning side. That must take a lot of cognitive dissonance.
How do you keep your own opinion straight in your head from one day to the next?
Just a couple comments from you on the JL Wrangler forum over the last few days ...
Well I was incorrect, and they addressed every single one of my concerns with this. Limited to 35’s? This has 37’s. Wheelbase too short for high speed under my previous impression of what’s needed? They’re running the Baja. And they obviously didn’t cheap out on the front suspension with a ranger set-up, this is Bronco-specific. So I had my concerns about an IFS but this removed those concerns.
You say that, but every off road event I have been going to is full of late model Jeeps. Chile Challenge this year was full of TJs, JKs, JLs, and Buggies. Easter Jeep Safari is over run with JKs and JLs. Literally the third JL I ever saw was on the trails out at Sand Hollow. Pretty much all you see on the trails these days are JKs and JLs. There are people out there wheeling these new Jeeps. You just have to get out of suburbia and into the dirt once in a while.
In my opinion, what your seeing in a Baha version is no way what will be offered in the retail market, And I think that is definitely not a 4 banger in that video. it's really not a comparison to the gen 1 models . body style is ok! but going to take some getting used to.
Stampede I thought the memes were funny and I certainly mean no ill will toward you or your opinion. I would love to see you make a funny meme as well honestly! We can have fun here. Guys like you and OX1 and NM Bronco have been staunch fans of SFA from the start and I am glad you can back it up with experience and knowledge. I was not intimately involved with the Bronco development but I was lets say 99% sure what we were getting based off of what I did work on. I am however 100% sure I want to keep my job and not spill the beans on Fords competitive information. With the reveal of this "R" I am a bit more comfortable to speak on the subject, but still I would rather address this in theory.
The SFA "purism" you guys have does not bother me nearly as much as IFS passivism. Unfortunately a lot of the "support" for IFS from people here is that they don't really care or that it doesn't matter for their needs or the needs of most buyers, so I understand your frustration. (I also think that the Bronco will be more successful than the FJ by an order of magnitude for a number of reasons even if they half assed the IFS, but that's beside the point).
I am 100% on your side when it comes to the idea of building the best OFFROAD performing rig that still legal and safe to drive on the road. I have absolutely zero interest in the "nice road manners" of IFS. I want the performance it gets me. The other obvious supporter of this I see is Jalisurr. Like you guys we want a jack of all trades, but where you want the bias towards rocks, we want speed over rugged terrain. We can debate till the cows come home which is "cooler", or more necessary, or whatever but I just wanted to make it clear that I am not simply indifferent on this, my support of IFS is grounded in offroad performance. And my hope is to show you guys that Ford is of the same mind, at least with the "R". There is nothing indifferent/passive/civilian/boring about that chassis.
Also I hope none of you guys really count this out until you see it perform. Jeep does a lot of great things, but they have also left a lot on the table and the Bronco is going to show it. Lets not forget they are trying to run the Baja 1000 with 4x4 IFS! That is objectively bad ass, and if the suspension and driveline can make it through that there should no longer be any doubt that IFS can be brutally tough. (now I hope I didn't jinx them)