Intercoolers

OX1

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
814
Reaction score
679
Location
jackson nj
Vehicle(s)
59 Bird, 70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos, 84 LTD 331 w/Vortech, 86 Capri 5.0 turbo, 14 Stang GT, 17 Fusion Sport
Any chance there is going to be more categories or sections? Understood not a whole lot to
talk about technically yet, but here goes.

So what do the F150 EB's guy do about IC's and dirt. I have plenty of rigs I've taken offroad, and plenty
with IC's, but none with both. Even the main trails @ my closest park, Rausch Creek, can have deep water holes
that start out the day pretty clean, but can sometimes be practically mud holes after 2-300 trucks cross through them.

Being the base engine is going to be a relatively high boost, high strung 4 banger, any concerns with a clogged IC?
Obviously radiators could have always been a concern in the past, but they've typically sat up higher and a bit farther back.
(and had much more surface area overall)........



Advertisement


 

TeocaliMG

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Matthew
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
402
Reaction score
1,062
Location
Dearborn Michigarn
Vehicle(s)
1987 f-250 6.9 idi diesel, 2004 jeep liberty sport
I have not taken an intercooled rig off road, but I think your point that we have always had radiators off road is a good benchmark. The area for either is proportional to the demand they need to meet so I wouldn't worry about that. The practical difference as you pointed out is the position. I would have to check out the package in detail to make a good judgement call if it were at any more risk than the radiator. As for the thermodynamics, any heat exchanger which is meant for air would simply love to be splashed with liquid, whether it is water or mud. The specific heat of water is orders of magnitude greater than air so you could take a huge area penalty so long as everything stays wet. I hate to make such grand statements, but I wouldn't be surprised if the IC (and radiator) performed better in the water hole (so long as mud/clay is not literally packed into every pore). The part that would worry me is afterwards, if you let your radiator or IC cake up with mud without a good spray down after your adventure you are asking for trouble. To me that is just common sense though.
 
OP

OX1

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
814
Reaction score
679
Location
jackson nj
Vehicle(s)
59 Bird, 70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos, 84 LTD 331 w/Vortech, 86 Capri 5.0 turbo, 14 Stang GT, 17 Fusion Sport
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #3
I have not taken an intercooled rig off road, but I think your point that we have always had radiators off road is a good benchmark. The area for either is proportional to the demand they need to meet so I wouldn't worry about that. The practical difference as you pointed out is the position. I would have to check out the package in detail to make a good judgement call if it were at any more risk than the radiator. As for the thermodynamics, any heat exchanger which is meant for air would simply love to be splashed with liquid, whether it is water or mud. The specific heat of water is orders of magnitude greater than air so you could take a huge area penalty so long as everything stays wet. I hate to make such grand statements, but I wouldn't be surprised if the IC (and radiator) performed better in the water hole (so long as mud/clay is not literally packed into every pore). The part that would worry me is afterwards, if you let your radiator or IC cake up with mud without a good spray down after your adventure you are asking for trouble. To me that is just common sense though.
The issue I see is gunking it up some main trail, then hit some harder rock trail and dry it out. Then back to a main trail, gunk it again, and take yet another harder trail. And there are even some decent optional mud holes that are fun, but dispersed enough to allow thorough heating/drying after.

Or have it jammed with snow all day long. You can get away with it having a radiator that runs all the way up to top of hood (only packing the lower end of it), but I don't see how you don't pack IC if it's as low as this Raptor??


Plenty of guys with turbo diesel 3/4-1 tons I guess, but most of them have full height IC that the lowest
spot is literally 7 feet up (big mudders). Hopefully the Bronco IC is more like that on diesels, being full radiator height.
 

jamanrr

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
78
Reaction score
37
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
18 Ford F150 Powerstroke,
The Subaru Forrester XT is a perfect example of this, it has the same turbo engine in it as the WRX. It puts all electronics (ECU) up high on the firewall on the wheel well and the intake is routed through the hood setup. I have gone through ditches and streams with water up to the door handles. It will handle it well if designed right by Ford.
 

DaBoss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
60
Reaction score
75
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
As @NMBronco pointed out, I'd be more worried about gunking-up your radiator. Really all that will happen with a gunked-up intercooler would be increased Intake Air Temps. Which of course will decrease power. I could however see a problem if people do not clean off their vehicles after driving through somewhere muddy, and it would freeze later on in the day. This would be under very certain circumstances though. Especially since all of the plumbing leading to and from the intercooler from factory will more than likely be plastic.

Happened to a friends old Subaru after talking him into driving through a mid pit a few winters ago.
 
OP

OX1

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
814
Reaction score
679
Location
jackson nj
Vehicle(s)
59 Bird, 70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos, 84 LTD 331 w/Vortech, 86 Capri 5.0 turbo, 14 Stang GT, 17 Fusion Sport
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #6
As I said, hope they either make it radiator size, or put it up higher. If they put it down low,
you could easily clog it up and only get part of radiator.
 

ChrispyKC

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,790
Reaction score
4,969
Location
Colorado or Kansas
Vehicle(s)
Explorer ST, Escape SE, JK Sahara
Top mount IC is also a good solution instead of FMIC or ones that are near the front wheel wells.
 

Nanook

First Edition
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jonathan
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
375
Reaction score
488
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
Ford Raptor, Ford Fusion, Ducati Diavel
The current gen Raptors need a larger IC for sporty driving in the SouthWest.
Baja tested, not Scottsdale approved
 

ChrispyKC

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
1,790
Reaction score
4,969
Location
Colorado or Kansas
Vehicle(s)
Explorer ST, Escape SE, JK Sahara
The current gen Raptors need a larger IC for sporty driving in the SouthWest.
Baja tested, not Scottsdale approved
The Scottsdale approval is a whole separate set of tests. Like, does it look good pulling up to The Mint? Will it get me better access to bottle service? How many bottles of Ace Of Spades will the bed carry? :)
 



Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
5.0Maverick 2.7L EcoBoost Engine / Bolt-On Mods / Maintenance 35
 








Top