Mud... deep mud.From what I understand, the 392 really just gets you a bigger engine, but not more capability - unless I’m mistaken.
Not really sure what the use case is for it.
Sponsored
Mud... deep mud.From what I understand, the 392 really just gets you a bigger engine, but not more capability - unless I’m mistaken.
Not really sure what the use case is for it.
You arent supposed to eat itMeh, this is leaning towards poor taste.
I think the Chiefs might be asking the same questionNice Bronco, “ was the Super Bowl yesterday? Huh…..
They only need to sell a few Wagoneers to pay for that.I thought it was pretty funny. I like how he whispered . . . "even though my name is Ford".
Props to Jeep for grabbing him for the ad, and BOO to Ford for not snapping him up. Like him or not, he is still an American icon.
The cost for a Super Bowl ad was $8M for a 30 second ad, and that was a full minute.
Cha - ching$$
You know what I meantYou arent supposed to eat it
A Jeep commercial that's muddled, huh?To us it seemed like Jeeps goal was to stay relevant (vs just leaning on past popularity) but they just couldn’t land the message. They gave the nod to their competition as if they inspired Bronco, but that fell flat at our house party since we’ve always felt the Gen 1 inspired the Gen6, not Jeep. My wife felt like the cabin with roaring fireplace and HF was them trying to stay current and the setting reminded her of the Yellowstone/1923 series, but she felt like they then failed to capitalize by it not also keeping it cattle/horse ranch themed. I personally think they missed an opportunity had HF left the cozy cabin and hopped in the Jeep for some deep snow winter fun in the mountains, but instead they showed mountain wheeling with all doors off? For us, it had the elements to be good and was a swing and a miss.
I have to ask how that is leaning towards poor taste, not to argue just to understand.Meh, this is leaning towards poor taste.