Badlands trim gets you there. Minus the 35's but the lift is there.Idk... if there was a way to get the 35ās without squatching but adding a dealer added lift kit Iād go that route. Now I gotta start planning again.
You, my friend, want a non-squatched Badlands.Iām not an off-reader AT ALL. Iām still thinking 33ā tires is a better choice for me. And I still wish there was a Sasquatch Light package where you get the suspension goodies without the tires and rims. I voted for 2.7L Sasquatch, as that is what I had myself considering prior to todayās announcement. More than likely though, I end up with 2.7L and no Sasquatch.
It's not the output but the stress this engine will take on and it constantly being in boost is what worries me, I have a strong gut feeling that down the road there will be far more issues with this engine.Cylinder counters crack me up. This "little 2.3" makes more power and torque then a lot of V8s did. Ford detuned this for the Bronco so users can fill up with 87 octane. Install the 93 Octane tune and this little 4 Cylinder makes 325hp and 375tq. Since when is that not enough to spin 35s???
This little guy is used in a number of applications including the Ranger (where it tows a good amount) and in the Mustang (where it does a good job of hauling ass).It's not the output but the stress this engine will take on and it constantly being in boost is what worries me, I have a strong gut feeling that down the road there will be far more issues with this engine.
I agree.It's not the output but the stress this engine will take on and it constantly being in boost is what worries me, I have a strong gut feeling that down the road there will be far more issues with this engine.
Thats what the 4.7 gears are for. With the right gearing a 1.5 engine can turn 35s. Your not going to be in the Boost all the time. Thats silly.It's not the output but the stress this engine will take on and it constantly being in boost is what worries me, I have a strong gut feeling that down the road there will be far more issues with this engine.
I'd 100% be in.I do wonder, how many that are gonna go with the 2.3 to get the manual would instead get a 2.7 if it was available with the manual?
weight / steep gear ratio / 35" or possibly even bigger tires.. just my 2 centsThis little guy is used in a number of applications including the Ranger (where it tows a good amount) and in the Mustang (where it does a good job of hauling ass).
Why do you think it won't be able to handle the Bronco? The weight of the truck?
Yeah, but with the manual you have control over the engine. Need a little torque...downshift. Think the engine is running too fast, upshift. Worried about the boost, make a gear decision there.weight / steep gear ratio / 35" or possibly even bigger tires.. just my 2 cents
Amen! One of my favorite cars was an RX8 I drove for 11 years rowing 6 gears with a silly grin on my face. The Bronco isn't going to rev to 9 grand or hug corners like it's on a rail, but being able to pick your own gears gives you so much more control and, for me, is so much more fun to drive.Yeah, but with the manual you have control over the engine. Need a little torque...downshift. Think the engine is running too fast, upshift. Worried about the boost, make a gear decision there.
It appears to me that people have forgotten the level of control you have with a vehicle when you are in charge of gearing decisions.
Even on my daily commute, I get frustrated because my automatic doesn't do what it "should". It doesn't understand anything that I want it to do. Granted, I have eyes and the transmission doesn't, which is precisely why I want to have control over it.