New Maverick video from Fabulous Ford

[Choispics]

Sponsored

 

[RLW]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

 

[carrellslake]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

I like that it is smaller than a Ranger, and has much better gas mileage. It would be a much better daily driver while still having a bed for truck tasks.

 

[Calicorks]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

Because it’s better to compete with yourself over competition. This one is smaller and easy to drive in urban areas. For the people who didn’t know they wanted a truck. Ranger is too intimidating for that buyer.

 

[The Driving Viking]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

This is what the Ranger should have been. Not that the current Ranger isn't a nice truck but it's big. The old Ranger was popular because it was small. Trucks keep getting bigger and bigger.

So many different folks are going to want the Maverick from guys that have a 3 hour drive to construction sites, people in bands, city folk, to soccer moms ect ect...

 

[Tricky Dick]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

Apparently it's the cheapest pickup in America, and the cheapest hybrid of any type. It should eat sales from traditional gas saver commuters.

 

[Deleted member 3063]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?
I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

I don't think Ford is going to be marketing Mav against Ranger though there will be some loss.

Think about it this way, better mpg, lower price, more features and tons more room than a

HONDA CIVIC
Which would you chose, if you had to?

 

[AZ_Liberty]

Ranger is going to siphon more sales from Escape and Explorer buyers. A short PU bed is far more practical than a close SUV bed for most people.

Ranger buyers are people who want a Tacoma but don't want to actually own an import. My dad will probably buy a Maverick, but would never buy a Ranger because "it's almost as big and expensive as an F-150 - buy one of those instead"

 

[Techun]

My wife wants a small truck. The ranger is nearly the same size as an f150 and the same price for less.

 

[AceGoliath]

So why get a maverick over a ranger?
Or vice versa?

I know they are different, but it seems they are so similar they are just going to take sales from each other and not amount to many “new” sales.

With a fully loaded 22 OBX 4Door Bronco and squatched on the way as my fun/off-road vehicle I’m highly considering the Maverick as my daily driver.

I was always going to keep my 2013 F150 FX4 that’s been paid off for a while, but with current trade-in values, rising gas prices, and living in the salt belt it makes sense to trade in the F150 now before issues arise. A decently optioned XLT Maverick should come at minimal cost out of pocket to me after trade in. I’ve only ever towed a minimal amount of times with the F150 anyways.

Main reason to answer your question would be the 40mpg and price. If they came out and said it was 25mpg I wouldn’t be thinking. I’d also like to have a pickup/bed. Never considered the Ranger or any other compact pickup because starting price for a base and fuel economy.

Sponsored