Side-by-Side Sighting: Sasquatch vs Non-Sasquatch Broncos and Jeep Wrangler Comparison

[Covfefe]

GO TAKE MORE PICTURES AND VIDEOS

Sponsored

 

[aplm7]

The Bronco on the right with the Squatch, is definitely wider than the other 2 Bronco's. I measured with my pen. And not just the wheels, but the front grill area...

 

[Rogues Gambit]

These pictures are going to cost me $$ and keep me from getting my desired manual transmission. That squatch. . . . wow.

OEM+it

 

[Jook13]

Manual Badlands, swap out the tires to 35's later.

I get the sentiment, it's one way to get manual with the offroad bits and 35s. But c'mon, the Badlands is 42k and then add tires on top of that. We don't know the cost of the squatch, but it should be well under the 12k difference to get the badlands. As awesome and exciting as the bronco is, fans of the manual are getting screwed

 

[High Proof]

There is something funky with the perspective on that first image. The Bronco on the right is at an angle yet if you measure the distance to the outside of the headlights it is wider than the one in the middle that is directly towards the camera. When you angle a 3d object in a 2d image you would expect the opposite to occur. The one in the middle doesn't appear to be further away from the camera.

It doesn't seem that way in the image shot from the hotel room.

Strange.

 

[Fordboi]

?? Hmmm so difficult to decide. Tech is important to me and the family. What I am looking at from performance standpoint the 2.3l and the V6 are close. I think it would be crazy to spend 40k plus and not even get a sound system as many other competitors offer that and more. So spend 40-50k for a bare bones vehicle is insane. I mean I am willing to do the 2.3l 4door with a sound system and hardtop on 33’s with a rear locker; then I am good ????

depends on what bare-bones means to you. a base, 2dr bronco is 29995 with destination fees

 

[Fordboi]

There is something funky with the perspective on that first image. The Bronco on the right is at an angle yet if you measure the distance to the outside of the headlights it is wider than the one in the middle that is directly towards the camera. When you angle a 3d object in a 2d image you would expect the opposite to occur. The one in the middle doesn't appear to be further away from the camera.

It doesn't seem that way in the image shot from the hotel room.

Strange.

do you get what i'm saying? or did i misinterpret your post?

 

[jimmycarter]

?? Hmmm so difficult to decide. Tech is important to me and the family. What I am looking at from performance standpoint the 2.3l and the V6 are close. I think it would be crazy to spend 40k plus and not even get a sound system as many other competitors offer that and more. So spend 40-50k for a bare bones vehicle is insane. I mean I am willing to do the 2.3l 4door with a sound system and hardtop on 33’s with a rear locker; then I am good ????

I hope you’re right here, my build keeps creeping towards that and I like your numbers a lot better!

I really want a BD with squatch + lux but that build ain’t available?

 

[High Proof]

do you get what i'm saying? or did i misinterpret your post?

The second image (from the hotel room) is harder to measure accurately. At least with the tape measure that I have on hand. The distance between the headlights seems to be decreasing at a close to even rate from left to right. But it might not if I broke out a micrometer.

The first image is still quite confusing. The image is big enough to measure accurately. The Bronco on the right definitely measures wider.

It is slightly forward but it doesn't look like enough to make the difference.

 

[Fordboi]

The second image (from the hotel room) is harder to measure accurately. At least with the tape measure that I have on hand. The distance between the headlights seems to be decreasing at a close to even rate from left to right. But it might not if I broke out a micrometer.

The first image is still quite confusing. The image is big enough to measure accurately. The Bronco on the right definitely measures wider.

number 1 or 2? if number 1, its because that massive mattress is still on there. if number 2, its because it has squatch package....

 

[aplm7]

The second image (from the hotel room) is harder to measure accurately. At least with the tape measure that I have on hand. The distance between the headlights seems to be decreasing at a close to even rate from left to right. But it might not if I broke out a micrometer.

The first image is still quite confusing. The image is big enough to measure accurately. The Bronco on the right definitely measures wider.

It is slightly forward but it doesn't look like enough to make the difference.

It's the Bronco Raptor on the right

 

[High Proof]

number 1 or 2? if number 1, its because that massive mattress is still on there. if number 2, its because it has squatch package....

It's not just the track that appears wider. It's the actual body. Distance between headlights, etc.

Most likely it's just because the Squatch is pulled a bit forward. Hard to imagine any other explanation. Just a strange perspective. Makes it look even bigger compared to the others than it is.

 

[Fordboi]

It's not just the track that appears wider. It's the actual body. Distance between headlights, etc.

Most likely it's just because the Squatch is pulled a bit forward. Hard to imagine any other explanation. Just a strange perspective. Makes it look even bigger compared to the others than it is.

yup. also cause of the heavy duty bumper etc.

 

[jimmycarter]

 

[basetaco2.7]

Man these Broncos are making Jeep owners sell their Jeeps lol i seen 2 for sale by owner today haha

Sponsored