I have only driven manuals - never owned an auto. I will not buy the 2.3, so no Bronco for me
Just signed the petition - thanks for organizing it!
Just signed the petition - thanks for organizing it!
Sponsored
Would people who really want a manual be satisfied with a V8 that put out slightly less torque than the tuned up 2.7, but nearly 100 more hp?... We have waited years for this Bronco, only to find out we will only get the 2.3 Ecoboost. We are die hard enthusiasts who row our own gears and are the people your entire reveal video is based on with all the off-road footage and outdoor focused model line ups. You are missing the mark ...
I have a Focus with a 2.0L and 5 MT. I don't want a 4 cylinder in a large 4x4 for off-roading. Period.Why do I feel like this group is only about 1,500 people who would actually pony up the cash.
0 of those people have tried a Bronco with the 2.3 + manual combination.
The Coyote is not the right engine for the Bronco. It makes lots of HP at high RPM, but not much torque down low.I'm curious, would the Coyote/10spd bridge the gap enough for the folks wanting a manual?
I feel like that is more likely than the 2.7L/7SPD, since FCA just stuffed a 392 into a JT/JL.
I just did a quick search on eBay of 2015-2019 mustangs (Ford's other enthusiast vehicle). 116 Autos and 109 manuals. That seems like much more than "a very small percentage "!every manufacturer gets roasted for not having a manual but in reality a very small % of buyers opt for this option.
If you ran a company would you make a product that you know you can't sell?
Ford and every other manufacturer wants to be able to sell their products.
I know this upsets the enthusiast but if Ford provided a manual for 2.7L with an up charge of 10K would you pay for it?
I just did a quick search on eBay of 2015-2019 mustangs (Ford's other enthusiast vehicle). 116 Autos and 109 manuals. That seems like much more than "a very small percentage "!