- Thread starter
- #1
One thing that I keep hearing over and over again from the media is that the Wrangler has more engine options (4) which they claim is a plus. But here is my perspective and one of the biggest reasons why I did not get a Wrangler a year ago.
- Two of their options (3.6 and the 2.0 turbo) are nearly identical engines when it comes to torque and HP. So there is not a lot that differentiates these two options. So you really only have 3 engine options.
- So option #1 (the 3.6 and 2.0) are under powered if you want decent power or the power to tow (we regularly tow our Polaris RZR XP4 which weighs about 2,500 lbs with trailer).
- Option #2 is their 3.0 diesel. This is a fantastic engine.! So what are the drawbacks? Well, it's a diesel and for the last 10 or so years, diesels are highly regulated. They have an EGR system that recirculates "dirty" exhaust back into the engine. They have a particulate filter that must go through a regular and finicky regeneration process. Fuel filters that must be changed regularly and fuel/water separators. You also have to buy and add diesel exhaust fluid. And their oil changes are relatively expensive. You skip all of these "negatives" with a gas engine.
- Option #3 (392) is incredible! I have a little experience with a 392 Wrangler Rubicon and it is awesome! But it is starts at $20,000 more that I paid for my Bronco. And I can't afford that.
Sponsored
Last edited: