Welcome, nice to have another new member that can see through some of the crap that gets slung around here and make sound and reasonable arguments without being argumentative.
But to do it in a GC trailhawk it’s 3395 for a 5.7 and 3895 for a 5.7 in summit I think.
People tend to forget that electric vehicles still need fossil fuels to create the electricity and the environmental impact that making those batteries has. Mining the lithium, flying it to China for processing, then back to the states for assembly. Then the real issue will come when they need to be disposed of properly. Most electric car "enthusiasts" will have owned their first and last one. There are no free rides.
Yeah but thats going up from v6 to the 5.7 liter, the 6.4 liter will cost more, and its not just the couple thousand on the engine, they built up the frame, way better exhaust, 2 inch lift, better fox shocks, and a upgraded screen and other features from the regular Rubicon, So if a Rubicon with most of the features this new 392 will have puts you over 60 thousand right now then its only common sense that a new Rubicon with all the new features and engine that i just named plus more will be a good bit more then 60k. But me and a lot of others might be wrong, they could sell it for the same price they sell a Rubicon for now with all the key features for a little over 60k but then no one would buy the Regular Rubicon and it would be very bad for business. So i guess we will see, you could be right, IDK i mean i hope you are i just dont see it.
