Water is the main reason.
Sponsored
The short and easy answer is that to build a vehicle that sells for X dollars, you have Y amount of money. You can spend that amount on whatever you want, but you can't spend it on everything. If you put a diesel engine, a carbon fiber body, off-road suspension or 27 cows worth of leather from animals that received daily shiatsu massages, that means you have less money to spend on the other items. With the Bronco, they spent a ton on the off-road goodies.After playing with the online builder since it came out and trying to decide if the next vehicle I buy in late 2022 will be a new F150 or Bronco, I have noticed a few things (that I am sure everyone else here has noticed): a very well optioned, 4 door Bronco gets really, really close to $60k, and for that much money in an F150, you can get an extremely luxurious F150. For just over $60k , you can get a short bed, 4 door F150 King Ranch that has ventilated seats, heated rear seats, rear AC vents, massage seats-just off the top of my head. I understand the Bronco is not the F150 and is geared towards being an off road beast...
Sounds like it's water/ weather resistant.It's hilarious to me all those that say it can't have a nice interior because the top comes off, but rave about the 12 inch screen which is an even more likely failure/damage area from the elements.
In the immortal words of David Byrne "Stop making sense".It's hilarious to me all those that say it can't have a nice interior because the top comes off, but rave about the 12 inch screen which is an even more likely failure/damage area from the elements.
Blackwood 2...Electric [reported to admins/mods]! I'd watch that wreck.Maybe they are saving that feature for the “Lincoln” version that the bean counters think they can dress up and sell In a few years. Maybe the Blackwood II.
Yup, water and durability. I assume they figure it out just not day one.Water is the main reason.
This... The question is 'Why does the Bronco cost $60k but not have xyz when other vehicles that cost the same amount have these features?' The answer is because those other vehicles don't have near as capable suspension, 4x4 system, lockers, swaybar disconnect, gearing, 35in tires, etc which are all really expensive features. The Bronco would likely cost upwards of $80k or more to include everything that makes it a capable offroader AND all the features on another vehicle that costs $60k without the off-road chops.The short and easy answer is that to build a vehicle that sells for X dollars, you have Y amount of money. You can spend that amount on whatever you want, but you can't spend it on everything. If you put a diesel engine, a carbon fiber body, off-road suspension or 27 cows worth of leather from animals that received daily shiatsu massages, that means you have less money to spend on the other items. With the Bronco, they spent a ton on the off-road goodies.
I'm not sure about the morally superior part, but rather arrogant maybe.I am visiting less and less... it's turning into a jeep forum where people who want a practical vehicle, or dare I say luxury or two, are sneered at.
My Bronco will be my daily driver, and the reason it will be a Bronco and not a jeep is in part due to the relative luxury it offers.
But it seems that there will always be the crowd that believes playing on rocks on the weekends is somehow a morally superior use than for those ppl that actually need the utility, but who also want some comforts too.
It was, but more of a pain to do, due to the high mount brake light and the change from the rear lap belts to shoulder belts.I'm not sure the top was even removable by the 5th Gen.