I do not understand governance in California... Here the city would have no say... the electric utilities are answerable to the PUC and the state house.... counties and cities would not have any say.... Oh they get input... they just are not the decision makers.Maintenance they were denied permission to do by Sacramento
OR are using "Sacramento" as a reference to the State Governance? AND why the hell would they be denied maintenance? I can understand new Infrastructure "takes".... but not maintenance. That does not make sense. Besides... How were they held liable in court if they were not allowed to do the maintenance that cause the fires??? There has to be more to this story because something is not adding up....
Sponsored
Last edited: