While I donāt totally disagree with your broad sentiment, ZPacs are quite effective in some of these cases in which the virus causes bacterial pneumonia by way of a secondary infection - much like the common flu does the in some cases. But in any case Iām sure the Mayo Clinic has one hell of a amateur forum for this.. canāt we go back to Broncos?How're those numbers working out for you now? We'll be at 60k this week, and may not have hit the peak yet. And we also know, have admitted, that these are not the complete numbers, because people died before being tested. Hell, some states, like the CA you talked about, are going to exhume and do autopsies all the way back to december. Also, 60k flu deaths a year is considered a very bad year, and we were lucky to have missed the most of flu season on this thing, it would've been alot worse if it had started spreading in sep/oct time frame instead of feb/mar. And estimates from CDC put 2-3million infected, as of right now.
And, Z-pacs, zinc, and hydrobullshit have all proven to be completely, and utterly, ineffective. Anyone who even though that a Zpac would be effective against a virus needs to give up their human card, because you do not have a friggen brain. Zpac is an anti-biotic. Virus =/= bacteria. in no way, shape, or form would any anti-biotic help vs a virus. But, that's 1st grade knowledge there, did you pass that grade?
And then there is hydrobullshit. Now, I've been mostly a supporter of our commander in chief since day 1. But after the last 4 months? to hell with that. The guy had invested at the start in this hydro-bullshit manufacturer, then started touting up its miracles to bump its stock so he makes money, despite the fact that the fatality rate of the drug itself is worse than this disease (but better than those it is designed to treat), and of there being zero to little evidence that it helped at all.
The only two saving graces right now are that the summer is upon us, and temp+humidity has shown to decrease the R0, and also that the R0 was fairly low (~3), so with a decent enough number of people obeying stay at home, and wearing masks, the R0 has dropped to about 1.2, which is a very slow, gradual growth. With heat and humidity increasing, we should be seeing the R0 drop below 1 within the next week or two. And that means a decease in cases for the next 5 months. until temps drop, everyone has forgotten about this shit, and then it hits again with an R0~3, but with 10-20k active cases (vs the few hundred thousand at the moment), and it is back into the 100s of thousands within 2 weeks before anyone reacts.
Oh, then lets talk about fucking immunity? Zero previous corona-virus's have had a complete immunity, ever. And zero have had a partial immunity that lasts beyond 2 years. So, why is this one going to be different? Herd immunity may not even work with this thing, or not very effectively, just like it doesn't with the common cold (which a few of the virus' that cause that are corona-virus). Without a vaccine, we are looking at a perennial disease with a >0.1% fatality rate. Yeah, 0.1%sounds really small. If 1/3rd of the population catches this every year, similar to other endemic diseases without complete vaccines (flu when the vaccine misses the target, common colds, etc) then that is 100k dead, per year. This would put it at number 5 for highest causes of death per year in the U.S., and this is some conservative numbers I'm spouting. But right now, we have seen a few days where this is the leading cause of death with such things as cancer, heart disease, injuries, averaged out over the year.
If the final tally on the fatality rate even remotely approaches 1%, you are talking 1 million plus dead a year, the highest cause of death by a factor of 2.
So yeah, no big fucking deal.
Oh, right, it mostly only effects old folks, right? I'm 38, overweight but not obese, an alcohlic, but no liver disease yet, no major medical issues. I am,according to the numbers, completely safe. I have less than a 0.03% chance of dying from this thing. But, I love my parents. They aren't as young as me (imagine that...), and are not as in good of health, obese, alcoholics with heart issues...their chances approach 5-7% for their age range. again, much better than not. If you had a 5-7% chance of dying every time you drove your truck, would you still drive every day?
So yeah, get a clue. There are some serious implications on this virus, some of it may get better once we have a better understanding, but as of where things sit, and look, right now, this is not a good prognosis unless we actively curtail activities that will lead to it's spread.
Sponsored