- First Name
- Brad
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 524
- Reaction score
- 1,087
- Location
- Green Bay, Wisconsin
- Vehicle(s)
- Jeep Wrangler Willys
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
Both Fords?
Sponsored
Don't forget the fan off is in the middle position on the 64 1/2!!All true with the exception of the year. There are 1965 mustangs, but there are no 1964 1/2 mustangs. As in VINS and registration.
+ @stampede1Don't forget the fan off is in the middle position on the 64 1/2!!
Also!! Carpet does not ride up to the threshold on 64 1/2s but instead has a vinyl strip!
Both of my Excursions had "SW" on the title...+ @stampede1
64 1/2s have value because the classic car market says they have value.
Official registration documentation is superfluous.
My wife's official MKC registration says its a "station wagon". That does not mean that any buyer actually thinks that the MKC is a wagon and not an SUV.
Give it another 30 years and check the values.....Both of my Excursions had "SW" on the title...
The main reason that the "1964 1/2" Mustang, or any other early muscle car had any value at all is because of the artificially created oil crisis of 1973. That's what brought about the onslaught of econo-boxes, and models like the Mustang II, as well as the crushing for scrap of the "gas guzzling" cars that collectors are (were) after at the popular auctions. Those became valuable because collectors are after survivors that didn't get scrapped.
Sorry. No new Bronco will every be worth anywhere near what those cars brought. Hell, I had a very early 2007 (built in Aug 2006) GT 500 convertible. 10 years later, while worth more than a 2007 Mustang GT, that GT 500 wasn't even worth half of what it cost new. In fact, from a ROI standpoint, I would have been better off to buy two 2007 Rangers. Go figure...
Of course, I never expected the GT 500 to be anything more than a fun car to drive for 10 years.
If I'm still here...Give it another 30 years and check the values.....