The list is privileged information so I don’t think it can be provided directly.What is the VIN range of the 1704 affected, if any one knows that?
Sponsored
The list is privileged information so I don’t think it can be provided directly.What is the VIN range of the 1704 affected, if any one knows that?
Glad I got a 2024
Build dates have never been accurate on any Bronco recalls. Build dates really don’t matter, affected actual VINs do.My 2024 was bult in November of 2024. Got to dealer in Feb 2025. How do they build 2025's in July 2024 and subject to a recall but a 2024 built 4 months after a 2025 is not.
This notice indicates the failure is tied to an issue in assembly - not in design.Leave it to the engineers to re-engineer a reliable engine and muck it up somehow.
YesDoes "engine assembly" mean they are replacing the entire engine?
I have the much more robust and reliable 2.7L, but I'm curious.
Where did you learn that the 2.7 is more reliable than the 2.3? It’s not.I have the much more robust and reliable 2.7L, but I'm curious.In the Ford parts breakdown, is there a part number/name for the 2.3L "Engine Assembly"? I'd imagine it doesn't include ancillary items like the alternator, turbos, and various other gizmos? Or maybe it does if it's the same part that gets dropped into the chassis on the assembly line.
There are part numbers for "fully dressed engines" but typically those aren't available except in some situations like this.I have the much more robust and reliable 2.7L, but I'm curious.In the Ford parts breakdown, is there a part number/name for the 2.3L "Engine Assembly"? I'd imagine it doesn't include ancillary items like the alternator, turbos, and various other gizmos? Or maybe it does if it's the same part that gets dropped into the chassis on the assembly line.
First, poking fun since everyone undeservedlyWhere did you learn that the 2.7 is more reliable than the 2.3? It’s not.
Personally, I'm not blaming the CEO pay, I'm blaming the CEO. He takes that massive compensation package for "all the responsibilities" of running a big, complex company. When the recall problems are this prolific, it's a systemic problem and the buck stops at the top. I'm sure he will gather tens of millions of dollars in a severance package, though, for all the good work that has been left behind in a smoldering heap of recalls.Sure, but to blame something like this on CEO pay is as ignorant as it gets.
Then I guess you blame the Board of Directors led by Bill Ford who are responsible for the CEO's performance.Personally, I'm not blaming the CEO pay, I'm blaming the CEO... it's a systemic problem and the buck stops at the top.
