I mean... 7% difference is pretty similar compared to 34% difference between 3.0 and 2.3L.I wouldn't really call 418 similar to 450... Otherwise I agree. Also towing capacity is much lower, so 3.5 would have been overkill.
It's all relative... One is certainly going to feel 450 vs. 418.I mean... 7% difference is pretty similar compared to 34% difference between 3.0 and 2.3L.
Engine torque is a pretty significant factor limiting towing and towing capacity is a major selling point. The 3.5 has 16% more torque than the 3.0.Towing capacity is not based purely on the engine, lol. You could put a Rolls-Royce jet engine in the Braptor and the tow rating would still suck.
2.7 Ecoboost can tow over 10,000 lbs in an F150, so... maybe that ~125% over the Braptor isn't the engine.Engine torque is a pretty significant factor limiting towing and towing capacity is a major selling point. The 3.5 has 16% more torque than the 3.0.
The 5.0 should have been an option for the regular Bronco.
Well now you’re just in dream land lolThe 5.0 should have been an option for the regular Bronco.
Why? There are more issues with the 10R80 compared to the 10R60.Honestly, giving the Bronco and the Raptor 10R80 transmissions would be far more useful than the 3.5.