- Thread starter
- #1
I know its going to come down to personal opinion and B&P but give me you 2 cents
Bandlands + MID = 43,829 (xplan) -
(-) No 2.7 engine (even though I dont feel like ill need it for my needs (plus would opt to tune the 2.3 down the road) , need to swap out the 33in tires for 35s somewhere down the road,
(+) upgraded goodies (headlights, dash, rear fender, Goats), manual
vs.
Black Diamond + SAS + MID = 42,520 (xplan)
(-) No manual, No 2.7, no upgraded rear fender, no upgraded, headlights, no upgraded gauge cluster, less GOAT,
(+) wheels and tires are set (still need to swap for ATs versus MTs)
Does going with the Badlands justify an extra 1300? even though yes... I know its a drop in the bucket at this point.
Thanks for any input.
orrr
Drop down to a Big Bend + 2.7 + SAS + MID = 43,385 ????
Daily Driver + Lets go have fun in the desert occasionally / get to trail heads for hiking
I like nicer quality components / materials.... dont know if I need the 2.7.
Thank you
Bandlands + MID = 43,829 (xplan) -
(-) No 2.7 engine (even though I dont feel like ill need it for my needs (plus would opt to tune the 2.3 down the road) , need to swap out the 33in tires for 35s somewhere down the road,
(+) upgraded goodies (headlights, dash, rear fender, Goats), manual
vs.
Black Diamond + SAS + MID = 42,520 (xplan)
(-) No manual, No 2.7, no upgraded rear fender, no upgraded, headlights, no upgraded gauge cluster, less GOAT,
(+) wheels and tires are set (still need to swap for ATs versus MTs)
Does going with the Badlands justify an extra 1300? even though yes... I know its a drop in the bucket at this point.
Thanks for any input.
orrr
Drop down to a Big Bend + 2.7 + SAS + MID = 43,385 ????
Daily Driver + Lets go have fun in the desert occasionally / get to trail heads for hiking
I like nicer quality components / materials.... dont know if I need the 2.7.
Thank you
Sponsored
