This comparo of the backside is a good example of why the Bronco "just looks better". It has that tall, Defender-like quality with a better stance. The Rubicon almost looks like it's squatting down under load-like it's filled with cement bags.????
Its funny, the people on the wrangler forum said the bronco looked simple and not manly. I think they both look pretty mean, but the bronco doesnt need the angry eyed headlightsThis comparo of the backside is a good example of why the Bronco "just looks better". It has that tall, Defender-like quality with a better stance. The Rubicon almost looks like it's squatting down under load-like it's filled with cement bags.
Of course the Bronco is a Squatch, so you might expect that, but even the non-squatch OBX today looks aggressive compared to a similar Wrangler.
You'd have to spend about $3-5 grand on the Wrangler to match. Spend an additional $3-5 grand on the Bronco, no contest.
Someone on another thread said this rubicon had 35s on it so it would be somewhat compatible to the squatch bronco..This comparo of the backside is a good example of why the Bronco "just looks better". It has that tall, Defender-like quality with a better stance. The Rubicon almost looks like it's squatting down under load-like it's filled with cement bags.
Of course the Bronco is a Squatch, so you might expect that, but even the non-squatch OBX today looks aggressive compared to a similar Wrangler.
You'd have to spend about $3-5 grand on the Wrangler to match. Spend an additional $3-5 grand on the Bronco, no contest.