Sponsored

New California Replacement Tire Standards [⛔️ ADMIN WARNING: NO POLITICS]

AZ_Liberty

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
3,604
Reaction score
5,371
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2007 Expedition
Your Bronco Model
Base
If they have to have less rolling resistance, then they will be made with less material, and not last as long.
Lower rolling resistance tires actually tend to be stiffer, so have a bit more material. They cost more.

That being said, not once in my life have I ever replaced factory tires with the same garbage rubber Ford installs.
Sponsored

 

ducksface

Stroppe
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2026
Threads
3
Messages
182
Reaction score
242
Location
Grand Canyon, Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2025 stroppe
Your Bronco Model
Stroppe
Clubs
 
Are you not convinced we need government to protect us :facepalm:

Arizona Shopping List
- Gas powered equipment (Mowers, Blowers, Generators, etc.)
- Insecticides
- Paint
- Ammunition
- Gas Cans
- Tires

Edit-
- Wood burning Fireplaces
- Water Heaters
- Gas Appliances
Nope.
Try Nevada.
We in arizona are all out of those items and they're on backorder.
(You'll love Las Vegas)
 

Steve_In_29

Heritage
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jul 6, 2025
Threads
12
Messages
704
Reaction score
1,041
Location
St Johns, Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2024 Heritage Limited, 2 Door, 1973 Bronco, 1999 Ranger, 2007 F350
Your Bronco Model
Heritage
I get your point. I agree the smog laws were good. I remember not being able to see the San Gabriel Mountains from the pier in Long Beach because of the smog.

But there are times when CA seems to lose a sense of perspective. I'm thinking about Proposition 65 and how it's enforced. At first it was a "lawyer enrichment act" then it was modified. But Prop 65 warnings have become a joke in many situations.
Prop 65 warnings on lumber are idiotic
 
Last edited:

Owl

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
G
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
522
Reaction score
363
Location
Sacramento
Vehicle(s)
White Wrangler JK, White Bronco Base 2Dr
Your Bronco Model
Base
Just remember... California gasoline was only supposed to cost approximately ten cents more than gasoline in the other states. That was the sales pitch years ago.

I paid $5.39 per gallon a few days ago. You boys and girls in the other states averaging $5.29 per gallon I assume?
 

Sponsored

CalvinT

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Calvin
Joined
Mar 15, 2022
Threads
18
Messages
2,754
Reaction score
3,533
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2002 Subaru WRX Wagon, 2023 Badlands (nonSAS)
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
Just remember... California gasoline was only supposed to cost approximately ten cents more than gasoline in the other states. That was the sales pitch years ago.

I paid $5.39 per gallon a few days ago. You boys and girls in the other states averaging $5.29 per gallon I assume?
I just filled at Costco on 8/12/26 for $3.99 for regular.
 

CalvinT

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Calvin
Joined
Mar 15, 2022
Threads
18
Messages
2,754
Reaction score
3,533
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2002 Subaru WRX Wagon, 2023 Badlands (nonSAS)
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
Cheaper to label it than face the penalty if someone spilled something nasty on it.
The fines are something like 2500 per violation per day.
I don't know if anyone has ben fined for not having the label.
Exactly, there is no penalty for putting the label on something that doesn't have carcinogens. But there are heavy penalties for not having a label. So you'll see labels on things that are safe just to avoid litigation.

The thing is, someone doesn't have to prove injury to sue. In general they just have to prove the existence of a listed carcinogen and they weren't notified. And there is no threshold. If the substance is detectable, you can sue. That's why you'll see the labels on leather wallets because leather dust is listed, wood dust is also listed, hence you'll see the label on piles of lumber.

I think, in general, the concept of notifying people is good. But there is no sense of perspective and it's scaring people unnecessarily. I've seen posts about people avoiding garden hoses because they have brass fittings with labels. Standard brass is copper and zinc, with a small percentage of lead. Federal Limits allow 0.25% lead, but CA has lead listed.
 
Last edited:

MilesTeg

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
58
Messages
493
Reaction score
844
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 2DR Badlands Manual/VB, 2018 F-150 Lariat/3.5EB, 2013 Mustang GT DIB
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Prop 65 warnings on lumber are idiotic
Sawdust is a known human carcinogen. It's why woodworkers have vacuum systems to collect and contain sawdust these days instead of just letting it float around in the air.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK590780/

Prop 65 is poor law, though it's intent was good. Usually if the company actually knows there is a carcinogen in their product, they will list it allowing you to discern between the CYA labels and more meaningful labels. Prop 65 helped me discover I was spraying formaldehyde all over myself (and breathing it). Also: fuck you Chemical Guys.
 

Notmattwong

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jan 31, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
121
Reaction score
381
Location
Pilot Point, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport Outerbanks, 2026 Bronco Base
Your Bronco Model
Base
Just remember... California gasoline was only supposed to cost approximately ten cents more than gasoline in the other states. That was the sales pitch years ago.

I paid $5.39 per gallon a few days ago. You boys and girls in the other states averaging $5.29 per gallon I assume?
Paid $3.99 in north Texas. I also fill up every 3-4 days.
 

MilesTeg

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
58
Messages
493
Reaction score
844
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 2DR Badlands Manual/VB, 2018 F-150 Lariat/3.5EB, 2013 Mustang GT DIB
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Just remember... California gasoline was only supposed to cost approximately ten cents more than gasoline in the other states. That was the sales pitch years ago.

I paid $5.39 per gallon a few days ago. You boys and girls in the other states averaging $5.29 per gallon I assume?
On the plus side, you're not breathing this air anymore:

Ford Bronco New California Replacement Tire Standards [⛔️ ADMIN WARNING: NO POLITICS] 1787186678354-x7
 

Sponsored

Badlands Traveler

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
98
Reaction score
380
Location
Mojave Desert
Vehicle(s)
Ford F150 XTL 4x4 2019. Bronco Badlands Sasquatch
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
I guess, I will buy my tires in Nevada.
 

DarthLincoln

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Chuck
Joined
Feb 11, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
2,710
Location
Northern California - Contra Costa County
Vehicle(s)
1999 BMW M coupe, 2023 Ford Bronco Badlands 2dr
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
The state spokesperson crowed about the new regs saving CA drivers $79 a year in gas costs while ignoring them having to spend way more then that for the new tires.
That is not what the commission said.

Just to correct the facts, the CEC $79 savings estimate is a NET savings that includes the added cost of tire. However, that $79 savings is realized over the 4-year life of the tire, not per year, and the tire industry strongly disagrees with the small price increase that the CEC used.
Ford Bronco New California Replacement Tire Standards [⛔️ ADMIN WARNING: NO POLITICS] IMG_2820

https://www.energy.ca.gov/proceeding/replacement-tire-efficiency-program-proceeding

This is clearly an initiative to reduce total energy consumption and pollution, a good goal especially in urban areas, but I think it’s a mistake to try to sell it as a cost savings for consumers.
 

Steve_In_29

Heritage
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jul 6, 2025
Threads
12
Messages
704
Reaction score
1,041
Location
St Johns, Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2024 Heritage Limited, 2 Door, 1973 Bronco, 1999 Ranger, 2007 F350
Your Bronco Model
Heritage
Sawdust is a known human carcinogen. It's why woodworkers have vacuum systems to collect and contain sawdust these days instead of just letting it float around in the air.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK590780/

Prop 65 is poor law, though it's intent was good. Usually if the company actually knows there is a carcinogen in their product, they will list it allowing you to discern between the CYA labels and more meaningful labels. Prop 65 helped me discover I was spraying formaldehyde all over myself (and breathing it). Also: fuck you Chemical Guys.
News Flash....EVERYTHING is carcinogenic (or out right fatal) with enough exposure.

The world is trying to kill us and no one gets out alive.

But hey if you are happy in your nanny state padded cage good for you.
 

Steve_In_29

Heritage
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jul 6, 2025
Threads
12
Messages
704
Reaction score
1,041
Location
St Johns, Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2024 Heritage Limited, 2 Door, 1973 Bronco, 1999 Ranger, 2007 F350
Your Bronco Model
Heritage
It amazes me how so many people point out all the problems with CA. Every state has problems, some address them and some don't. CA addressed smog because it was so bad especially in SoCal in the LA basin. That initiated the CA auto emissions requirements. That did eventually end up being used nation wide. That has helped reduce smog in CA as well as many cities with that problem. I don't know about everybody else, but I like breathing cleaner air and don't mind the cost to have it.

I suppose CA should have been blamed for creating smog.

I am not native Californian, but have been here since 1969 and don't see any reason to leave. There are things I don't like about it but more that I do like. Why move to another place that also has things that I don't like. To each his own.

Do I want low rolling resistance tires? No, but I will adapt if need be and leave being concerned to bigger issues.
A gilded cage no matter how pretty is still a cage
 

Steve_In_29

Heritage
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jul 6, 2025
Threads
12
Messages
704
Reaction score
1,041
Location
St Johns, Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2024 Heritage Limited, 2 Door, 1973 Bronco, 1999 Ranger, 2007 F350
Your Bronco Model
Heritage
That is not what the commission said.

Just to correct the facts, the CEC $79 savings estimate is a NET savings that includes the added cost of tire. However, that $79 savings is realized over the 4-year life of the tire, not per year, and the tire industry strongly disagrees with the small price increase that the CEC used.
Ford Bronco {thread} {filename}

https://www.energy.ca.gov/proceeding/replacement-tire-efficiency-program-proceeding

This is clearly an initiative to reduce total energy consumption and pollution, a good goal especially in urban areas, but I think it’s a mistake to try to sell it as a cost savings for consumers.
So the figures (as most things CA .gov puts out) are fabricated BS.

Aside from the costs to the manufacturer for the materials and construction, there WILL be the mandated testing procedures the State will require the tire companies to foot the bill for to get their approval (just as CA requires gun makers to pay for the privilege of selling their pistols in the state) to say nothing of the cost of the added bureaucracy they will have to create. Tire Czar anyone?
Sponsored

 
 





Top