Can't count on the drivers to not hammer through it while slipping the clutch LOLNot sure. Perhaps it has something to do putting too much stress on the clutch, causing premature wear and potential failure. But that's just my guess.
Sponsored
Can't count on the drivers to not hammer through it while slipping the clutch LOLNot sure. Perhaps it has something to do putting too much stress on the clutch, causing premature wear and potential failure. But that's just my guess.
Not getting a Bronco is an option. The Bronco was going to be a fun, stick daily that could offroad a bit and pull a racecar. With no manual on the good engine and no more towing capacity than the 2.7 EcoBoost MKX I already own, it offers no advantage to me.you get WAY more power than the 3.6L Wrangler. So if the 2.7L being auto only is a deal breaker, where are you going to go? An even less powerful Wrangler? I just don't understand...
"Power under the curve matters." Then you immediately try and call out peak numbers?I'm well aware of area under the curve. I am a Ford engineer who does powertrain development for a living. The 2.3L develops great torque at low RPM. Peak torque comes at 3000 RPM. The 3.6L doesn't hit peak torque until 4800 RPM.
Because the 4cyl EcoBoost is hot thrashy garbage. I've driven bunches of them, including on Lincolns, where you think they'd care about NVH, but they feel exactly like driving my parents' old '99 Contour - they vibrate, there's an echo-y hollow, buzzy intake sound, and the exhaust sounds horrible. Sure by the numbers it's fine, but the actual driving experience is terrible.I just think a lot of the negative Nancys on here need to actual DRIVE THE VEHICLE before they decide they won't buy one.
A Ford powertrain engineer doesn't even know bellhousings?I believe they have different bellhousings. Plus the max torque rating on the manual transmission may not have been sufficient for the 2.7L.
"Part time" 4x4 is regular, traditional locking 4x4, the kind you want - "4H" on the dial. "Full time" 4x4 is automatic 4wd, the kind that is useful in snow and other on-road driving - "4A" on the dial. Every Bronco has "Part time," some have "Full time."what the heck is part time selective engagement in the base 4x4, if i put it in 4wd, i want 4wd not part time.
Haha. You know what I meant!
I do apologize if I am coming across somewhat assholish, I am a bit aggrivated. between these two gripes, which are both related to the manual, and the subscription nav, Ford got SO SO close to nearly perfect.Ah I see. I misinterpreted what you were saying. You are correct. My apologies!
yes the white top is so much cooler when your baking in the sunSo what's the deal with the white top and white grill in these? Is that somehow included in the Sasquatch package that spans all trims? Absolutely have to have the white.
ok... um... a Bronco with a white roof? That any better? ?Haha. You know what I meant!
ok, I can live with that I think. So now it is, how hard to swap the 2.3 for a 2.7 crate. Bellhousing will be part of this.My understanding is that it utilizes the traction control system and ABS to brake the inside wheel. So I guess you could probably find a way to flash different software to the ABS module to enable it and then add the physical switch. I'm sure someone will figure this out after they go on sale.
150k on the clock , your just about getting it paid for, and time for major repairs, the v8 isnt that way,300,000 miles is far beyond our engineering targets, and frankly, no one in the industry designs for that kind of durability in a light-duty vehicle. Commercial vehicles are a different story. But our light-duty vehicles are usually engineered with 150,000 mile life before major repairs are needed. I think you will find that to be pretty standard in the industry.
At least it's not true old school.150k on the clock , your just about getting it paid for, and time for major repairs, the v8 isnt that way,
i I know that isnt an option, i understand that at 150 k its time to buy a new one.
https://www.f150ecoboost.net/threads/300-000-miles-on-my-2011-eco-boost.28082/show us one that has over 300,000 miles that dosent have the $2800 turbos REPLACED and i will be more interested.
granted that was a $500 rebuild that took a weekend if nothing was really busted.At least it's not true old school.
Because those burned a quart of oil a week and needed a full rebuild before 100k miles.
That thing is fucking hideous.Plenty of pics on the website, but I can't find this color combo in any of the models...
View attachment 10813
View attachment 10814
View attachment 10815
View attachment 10816
And most blocks would have at least two guys that could do it.granted that was a $500 rebuild that took a weekend if nothing was really busted.
you dont say but i bet it wasnt a 4 banger with a standard