Sponsored
Status
Not open for further replies.

North7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Threads
112
Messages
7,301
Reaction score
25,622
Location
North Texas
Vehicle(s)
SUV
Your Bronco Model
Undecided
Clubs
 
Ford has hired a new executive director of quality, Josh Halliburton, in a newly created position under CEO Jim Farley.

This story seems to have gone under the radar until this week when Ford has been making the press with a number of personnel changes. This is great news, Jeep did the same thing back in 2014 with the quality having attained joke status. Over the last few years reviews point to improved quality at Jeep so I'm hopeful Ford can achieve the same kind of turnaround.

Ford Quality Issues Now Being Tackled By Former J.D. Power Executive
Now, in an effort to shore up a number of recent Ford quality issues, the automaker has hired quality turnaround specialist and former J.D. Power Vice President Josh Halliburton as its new executive director of quality, according to the Detroit Free Press.
Ford Bronco, Ranger Plant Manager No Longer With Company
CEO Jim Farley has recently placed a major focus on quality, even going so far as to hire quality turnaround specialist and former J.D. Power Vice President Josh Halliburton as its new executive director of quality, who recently stated that the automaker’s quality issues will begin to subside as early as next year.
'Black eye for the company': How Ford is fixing spate of quality problems
And in January, Ford brought in a new quality czar to oversee the effort. Josh Halliburton came from data analytics firm J.D. Power to serve as Ford's new executive director of quality. His specialty is in process quality improvement, and he's helped overhaul processes at more than 100 plants around the world. In his new role, Halliburton is tasked with implementing a strategy to improve quality across Ford.
Ford Vows to Clean Up Quality as Recalls Hit Hard
Ford, for its part, knows that recalls and quality are a problem and have appointed “quality czar” Josh Halliburton to shake things up at Ford. He can’t get to work fast enough.
“They are the No. 1 problem at Ford right now. And it’s the worst in the industry when it comes to recalls and warranty work,”
Update 8/7/2022
The Wall Street Journal has now joined the party, here are some of the article highlights.

At Ford, Quality Is Now Problem 1
By Nora Eckert
Updated Aug. 6, 2022 12:44 pm ET

Josh Halliburton joined Ford F -0.46%â–Ľ Motor Co. in January to help improve its shaky quality record. Within months it was clear how big a challenge he faced.

In the first seven months of the year, Ford had 46 separate safety recalls on 6.8 million vehicles, more than any other U.S. auto maker.

Last year Ford set aside more than $4 billion for warranty costs, up 76% from five years earlier. Its total warranty expenses increased about 17% from 2016 to 2021.

Quality problems have long been a drag on the company’s bottom line. Ford took hefty charges against its earnings several times in the last decade to address issues, and it contended with bungled new-model launches that led to delays. When Chief Executive Jim Farley took over in October 2020, he made quality a top priority, pledging to lower warranty-related costs and earn back customers’ trust.

1659871578496.png


This year, in addition to the recalls, auto-safety regulators also opened a defect investigation into 2021 Ford Broncos after receiving reports of what an auto-safety regulator called “catastrophic engine failures” at highway speeds.

“We continue to be hampered by recalls and customer satisfaction actions,” Mr. Farley said in a July earnings call. “This affects our cost but more importantly, it falls short on our most fundamental commitment to our customers.”

1659871605613.png


One of the challenges he identified at Ford was that it tried to make too many last-minute design and engineering changes ahead of a new-vehicle launch, increasing the risk of problems down the line. He said workers rallied to fix problems when they blew up, but weren’t empowered to flag them early in the process when there was still time to head them off.

“It wasn’t a top priority,” he said. “Everyone wants to make sure they can hit the targets we are aiming to achieve. If the goal was to launch on time, we were often focused on getting to launch versus prioritizing quality.”

It’s important, he said, to reward those people who do find problems early. “We are aligning specific objectives to the directly responsible individuals for the aspects of quality they are in control of,” he said. “Thus making it much more clear how each person directly fits into our quality goals.”

Mr. Halliburton said he expects to see Ford’s warranty problems improve next year, but it may take two to three years to see the most impactful results. With that, he expects to also mend Ford’s reputation with frustrated customers.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

MJJ

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
Sean
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
770
Reaction score
1,755
Location
Iowa
Vehicle(s)
JL Wrangler Rubicon, Jeep Wagoneer, Colorado ZR2
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
By hiring a JD Power exec, Farley’s primary goal is to influence MARKETING more than quality.

Remember that Farley came up through the ranks as CMO (Chief Marketing Officer). I am suspect this new hire will truly change the quality. Farley needs to tell Wall St something about he is addressing the issue.
 
OP
OP
North7

North7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Threads
112
Messages
7,301
Reaction score
25,622
Location
North Texas
Vehicle(s)
SUV
Your Bronco Model
Undecided
Clubs
 
By hiring a JD Power exec, Farley’s primary goal is to influence MARKETING more than quality.

Remember that Farley came up through the ranks as CMO (Chief Marketing Officer). I am suspect this new hire will truly change the quality. Farley needs to tell Wall St something about he is addressing the issue.
I hope you're not right, but then again, you may be on to something.

This statement gave me hope:
His specialty is in process quality improvement, and he's helped overhaul processes at more than 100 plants around the world. In his new role, Halliburton is tasked with implementing a strategy to improve quality across Ford.
Sounds like someone with the power to replace "Michigan Assembly Plant manager Erik Williams".
 

Carolina Jim

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Threads
29
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
10,444
Location
Highlands
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco 2-door
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
I am suspect this new hire will truly change the quality
A Quality Guru is a 1990s bandaid. Next step will probably be ZD (Zero Defect) Days & a few banners for the plants
 

Sponsored

MJJ

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
Sean
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
770
Reaction score
1,755
Location
Iowa
Vehicle(s)
JL Wrangler Rubicon, Jeep Wagoneer, Colorado ZR2
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
I hope you're not right, but then again, you may be on to something.

This statement gave me hope:
Sounds like someone with the power to replace "Michigan Assembly Plant manager Erik Williams".
I hope your right and I am wrong!
 

HBTFD

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
Base Sponsor (Level 1)
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Threads
51
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
5,170
Location
Newnan GA
Vehicle(s)
F350
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
Clubs
 
From my perspective as the guy responsible for all supplier quality issues at a Ford plant for 3 years. The OEMs (Ford is one of the worst) best the suppliers down on cost. Remember Ford only manufacturers sheet metal, some castings of powertrain components and frames. Ford will design a part but balk at the cost when an OEM quotes the price. So they go back and forth until the lowest tier one agrees to a price. Ford would always try to pin the costs of poorly designed parts on suppliers. I can’t tell you how many stack up issues were caused by poor design. 85% of warranty claims were due to parts, not the assembly plant. The “quality guru” is a PR move. Building quality vehicles requires the investment up front and commitment to maintain quality in the vehicle.
 

bytheway

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Brice
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Threads
72
Messages
1,535
Reaction score
4,426
Location
Louisville, KY
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
From my perspective as the guy responsible for all supplier quality issues at a Ford plant for 3 years. The OEMs (Ford is one of the worst) best the suppliers down on cost. Remember Ford only manufacturers sheet metal, some castings of powertrain components and frames. Ford will design a part but balk at the cost when an OEM quotes the price. So they go back and forth until the lowest tier one agrees to a price. Ford would always try to pin the costs of poorly designed parts on suppliers. I can’t tell you how many stack up issues were caused by poor design. 85% of warranty claims were due to parts, not the assembly plant. The “quality guru” is a PR move. Building quality vehicles requires the investment up front and commitment to maintain quality in the vehicle.
Isn’t that essentially the story of the MIC top? Ford designed it and then blamed Webasto when the problems started rolling in.

See also: 2.7L valves
 

HBTFD

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
Base Sponsor (Level 1)
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Threads
51
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
5,170
Location
Newnan GA
Vehicle(s)
F350
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
Clubs
 
Isn’t that essentially the story of the MIC top? Ford designed it and then blamed Webasto when the problems started rolling in.

See also: 2.7L valves
MIC top - Ford desided to skip the industry wide development process (PAPP). The lockdowns were a factor but Ford knew the risks of skipping development milestones.
 

Sponsored

Snowdogyyz

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Aug 7, 2021
Threads
32
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
3,316
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
22 Ford Bronco Badlands
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Clubs
 
From my perspective as the guy responsible for all supplier quality issues at a Ford plant for 3 years. The OEMs (Ford is one of the worst) best the suppliers down on cost. Remember Ford only manufacturers sheet metal, some castings of powertrain components and frames. Ford will design a part but balk at the cost when an OEM quotes the price. So they go back and forth until the lowest tier one agrees to a price. Ford would always try to pin the costs of poorly designed parts on suppliers. I can’t tell you how many stack up issues were caused by poor design. 85% of warranty claims were due to parts, not the assembly plant. The “quality guru” is a PR move. Building quality vehicles requires the investment up front and commitment to maintain quality in the vehicle.
Very good point- crap in equals crap out! When I was a plant manager for a medical company, the president forced me to buy the cheapest imported yarn possible to make a few different products with. I had already test run it before and it was a disaster. Ran like crap. Tore up machines, lousy end product, etc. “But we need to sell at this cost to get the most margin”. No matter how many times I told him you’re going to lose that margin in defective product replacement and loss business, he still forced it.

Well many defective products/issues later………. “Where did our margin go?”
Duh.
 
OP
OP
North7

North7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Threads
112
Messages
7,301
Reaction score
25,622
Location
North Texas
Vehicle(s)
SUV
Your Bronco Model
Undecided
Clubs
 
I'm not seeing where Halliburton's creds are. All I could find is he has a degree in electrical engineering and North7's thread (this one). Hopefully Halliburton's creds are on-the-job-training (which I take any day). But he comes from JD Power? A bit fuzzy for me...
Yes, info seems thin, this is all I could find:
His specialty is in process quality improvement, and he's helped overhaul processes at more than 100 plants around the world. In his new role, Halliburton is tasked with implementing a strategy to improve quality across Ford.
Whoever has a Linkedin account, can you look him up please?
 

Arrowbear Rider

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
Marcus
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
860
Reaction score
1,200
Location
Laguna Woods, Ca
Vehicle(s)
Bronco, Triumph Thunderbird Commander 1700
Your Bronco Model
Base
Clubs
 
By hiring a JD Power exec, Farley’s primary goal is to influence MARKETING more than quality.

Remember that Farley came up through the ranks as CMO (Chief Marketing Officer). I am suspect this new hire will truly change the quality. Farley needs to tell Wall St something about he is addressing the issue.
"His specialty is in process quality improvement, and he's helped overhaul processes at more than 100 plants around the world. In his new role, Halliburton is tasked with implementing a strategy to improve quality across Ford."

PROCESS QUALITY.

Not, marketing. Using data he has overhauled more than 100 plants. That's not marketing, I don't care what you think you know about JD Power, but it doesn't sound like you've studied or worked in process improvement.

Or reading comprehension. Did you even look up the guy or just run with JD Powers?
 

Arrowbear Rider

Base
Well-Known Member
First Name
Marcus
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
860
Reaction score
1,200
Location
Laguna Woods, Ca
Vehicle(s)
Bronco, Triumph Thunderbird Commander 1700
Your Bronco Model
Base
Clubs
 
Very good point- crap in equals crap out! When I was a plant manager for a medical company, the president forced me to buy the cheapest imported yarn possible to make a few different products with. I had already test run it before and it was a disaster. Ran like crap. Tore up machines, lousy end product, etc. “But we need to sell at this cost to get the most margin”. No matter how many times I told him you’re going to lose that margin in defective product replacement and loss business, he still forced it.

Well many defective products/issues later………. “Where did our margin go?”
Duh.
Your post is right on. Poor materials make bad finished products. There are ways to see that and someone with process knowledge can see that and then not do what your bean counter president was doing.

Having work a bit in process control and studied under a former student and employee of Dr. Deming, I seen where using data to change the process works and I wouldn't worry about the JD Powers thing, they are not just marketing; they have engineers that know how to measure quality using date.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 


Top