- Thread starter
- Banned
- #16
That’s the spirit!I voted I like polls. because we are having fun.
Sponsored
That’s the spirit!I voted I like polls. because we are having fun.
No passenger is getting in my Bronco with food of any kind. They can starve back there.
I'm sitting up front and there are 2 of them...... I have a feeling someone will come up with a solution to replace the nets with real cup holders.Majority of the time, it's just gonna be me in the truck. Otherwise, I don't let anyone else eat or drink in my vehicles.
So current config of cupholders is good for my needs.
Me too!I'm disappointed not more people like poles
Honestly the reluctance of anybody to have a built in kleenex box holder bothers me more than the number of cupholders.All this cup holder craziness had me wondering, so I took two second to find this.
![]()
The lack of feminine napkins also is disappointing. It seems less of an innocent oversight, and more of an oppressive jab by the overbearing CIS patriarchy...Honestly the reluctance of anybody to have a built in kleenex box holder bothers me more than the number of cupholders.
I don't know if any other makes have but it is a concept that has totally escaped Ford.
In my truck the first three are sacrificial, it takes about that many to get down to a clean one after the box has been rolling around on the floor for who knows how long.The lack of feminine napkins also is disappointing. It seems less of an innocent oversight, and more of an oppressive jab by the overbearing CIS patriarchy...
Yeah. No.How did Ford miss so bad on this?
This is what I'll have to resort to in my 4dr:
![]()
![]()
LOL, those "cup holders" were horrible, but they were a great excuse to prevent others from bringing beverages into my M5.Number of years ago I had an E39 M5. After living with that thing, and the German concept of what they thought "Cupholders" were, I'll be fine.
Ford could literally hang a sock from the roof and I'd be fine with it.
![]()