Oh I get what you did here you equated larger with insecure. Because that is the most logical thing... Someone buys something that is actually functional they must be insecure. It would be like if I was to assume because you see insecurity in a large truck that your just jelly of those that can afford it... See we can go in circles ... It's fun to make generalization.Not everyone needs a truck large enough to haul all their insecurities but still needs a vehicle with a bed.
Point made.Oh I get what you did here you equated larger with insecure. Because that is the most logical thing... Someone buys something that is actually functional they must be insecure. It would be like if I was to assume because you see insecurity in a large truck that your just jelly of those that can afford it... See we can go in circles ... It's fun to make generalization.
Love youPoint made.
Too easy.
I saw that you’re from Texas and just assumed it’s cuz everything’s larger in Texas. Another generalization though I suppose.Oh I get what you did here you equated larger with insecure. Because that is the most logical thing... Someone buys something that is actually functional they must be insecure. It would be like if I was to assume because you see insecurity in a large truck that your just jelly of those that can afford it... See we can go in circles ... It's fun to make generalization.
No that's actually true.I saw that you’re from Texas and just assumed it’s cuz everything’s larger in Texas. Another generalization though I suppose.
Well damnit hal what am I supposed to do with that?...Love you
Nope, have them larger as wellI saw that you’re from Texas and just assumed it’s cuz everything’s larger in Texas. Another generalization though I suppose.
At 210"+, the Ranger is bigger than the F150 used to be. A mini truck it ain't.The Maverick seems like the biggest waste of a truck ever. Why would you want smaller then the already small Ranger?
Whoa, that actually looks good. Even without all of the smoke and backlighting. Toyota has so few vehicles with any decent styling. They should offer this as an option package.
You guys need to specify U.S. or world-wide. Let's clear that up so there aren't any issues later.I will take that bet. Year to date release. Mark your calendar
Full-size trucks have gotten ridiculously huge. The current Ranger is almost as big as an F-150 from the 80s-90s. If they'd offering the 2.7L in it I'd be driving one. The Maverick has a lot of potential for city dwellers, younger people and commerical applications.The Maverick seems like the biggest waste of a truck ever. Why would you want smaller then the already small Ranger?
Do you need to register that in 2 adjacent zip codes?Many just do not understand history and only see things as they would want them.
Whatever your need of payload capacity is, means everyone else needs the same.
Really, this is all Ford should be selling, it will cover everyone's needs.