50-State compliant Intercoolers

[Q1svt]

@Brian_B

18 # of boost is a lot for a OEM

Ford 2.3 puts out 18+- pounds of boost

Sponsored

 

[Brian_B]

@Q1svt - that’s actually some pretty good info

 

[Returntothefog]

A little off topic, I do think the 2.3 & 2.7 in the bronco pushing out 18psi boost is pretty surprising(ly good)

 

[Ducati1098]

A little off topic, I do think the 2.3 & 2.7 in the bronco pushing out 18psi boost is pretty surprising(ly good)

You should feel it when it pushes 30psi
It’s pretty fun lol

 

[Returntothefog]

You should feel it when it pushes 30psi
It’s pretty fun lol

I heard u can only do it once tho, per Bronco anyway

 

[Ducati1098]

I heard u can only do it once tho, per Bronco anyway

Lol nah. Well maybe the 2.3, I’m not sure.

But the 2.7/3.0 is built like a brick shit house. I daily mine and it sees ~30 almost every day for the last 2 years lol

 

[Returntothefog]

Lol nah. Well maybe the 2.3, I’m not sure.

But the 2.7/3.0 is built like a brick shit house. I daily mine and it sees ~30 almost every day for the last 2 years lol

Really? I daily my 2.7 too and I have never see it hit above 20 even when I go flat out without top speed limiter put the shackles on me, no tune or nothing on mine tho.

 

[Ducati1098]

Really? I daily my 2.7 too and I have never see it hit above 20 even when I go flat out without top speed limiter put the shackles on me, no tune or nothing on mine tho.

Oh yeah, no not stock it won’t. But I agree for a stock engine 18-20 is impressive.

 

[Willub]

@Willub why didn’t you and Grayxyz tell / teach @Brian_B how turbo & intercoolers work?​

​

oh yeah cause you haven’t figured it out yet lol​

Stick to the RTR PI work. Much funnier.

 

[swamp2]

I believe the whipple one edges Cobb out slightly (spec wise), but the difference is not big.

Can you quote the official spec(s) you're referring to?

 

[Returntothefog]

Can you quote the official spec(s) you're referring to?

Not a lot of direct dyno comparisons n most are cherry picked attributes but most direct Whipple has 58% volume increase over Cobb 53%.
If anyone know more please correct me

 

[telenerd]

Just moving to Wyoming where rolling coal next to a bunch of pedestrians is considered a right of passage.

 

[Brian_B]

Whipple has 58% volume increase over Cobb 53%.

That’s a good find.

The fin area and restriction stats Whipple puts out are the real $$& though. Volume doesn’t mean a lot by itself without those two stats to back it up. But the fact that Whipple knows that and put them out says a lot.

To be fair I’m sure Cobb knows too, juat
not in their advertising, where it should be for people trying to make informed decisions.

Otherwise, you know, we may as well just
compare frontal surface area and call them all equal.

 

[telenerd]

I’m considering a intercooler for my Ranger Raptor for the stock location. Bronco I plan on doing a high mount intercooler for a hidden winch.

 

[Returntothefog]

That’s a good find.

The fin area and restriction stats Whipple puts out are the real $$& though. Volume doesn’t mean a lot by itself without those two stats to back it up. But the fact that Whipple knows that and put them out says a lot.

To be fair I’m sure Cobb knows too, juat
not in their advertising, where it should be for people trying to make informed decisions.

Otherwise, you know, we may as well just
compare frontal surface area and call them all equal.

Yea I believe this is a “u can’t go wrong between the two” situation unless u are counting down to the very nitty gritty of gains. Can’t speak for everyone but I certainly won’t be able to tell like <3 hp gain difference.

Cobb also has this dyno study but whipple does not, no direct comparison there

https://www.cobbtuning.com/ford-bro...lYgH42Q9LKgOMzprnQA0ZfXvRwDJI0mHJQuDJTZsddd_P

Sponsored