Like the aftermarket cooling that failed on the Bronco R?Aftermarket always has a solution to OEM's problem
Sponsored
Like the aftermarket cooling that failed on the Bronco R?Aftermarket always has a solution to OEM's problem
I want to know who they went with, and what exactly went wrongLike the aftermarket cooling that failed on the Bronco R?
After they had a collision though. It could’ve been unrelated, but we’ll probably not ever know.Like the aftermarket cooling that failed on the Bronco R?
From what we know, it was not related based on articles posted to this site.After they had a collision though. It could’ve been unrelated, but we’ll probably not ever know.
I would assume custom fab and expertise by a professional race team and shop.I want to know who they went with, and what exactly went wrong
I trust aftermarket over oem
There was a rollover, skidplate damaged and heavy mud as wellI would assume custom fab and expertise by a professional race team and shop.
This is false. The 7.3l was built for abuse in work environments. Heavy loads and sustained rpms. Yes it's overbuilt, but it's not built for force induction from the factory. The 5.0 responds well to boost. It's strong and it flows well.The 7.3L Godzilla was designed from the start for Forced Induction, as the Coyote as well, so it would only be a "cost" issue.
It's more than just what sells. I'm positive people on the development team would love to stuff a V8 in the Bronco, but the gov regulates automotive companies as a whole and they have avg mpg targets they need to hit by a certain year (which include all models outside of commercial vehicles I believe). Hence why companies have started using small displacement engines with boost. They can get epa rated at higher mpg's while offering solid performance.It comes down to "What Sales". That's what Ford will want. If a V8 will sale better than a V6TT, you can bet that they will offer it.
.... and all of this V6TT being better than a V8 is BS! You do realize that a Turbo or Supercharger can be Added to a V8, don't you? When you try to compare a NA Motor to a Turbo/Supercharged Motor, it's not an Apple to Apple comparison. The only true way to compare them is to either remove the Turbo/Supercharger and compare them a both are NA.... or install the same Forced Induction on the NA Motor.
getting down off on the soapbox now.......
Basically, the government can't let us have what we wantIt's more than just what sells. I'm positive people on the development team would love to stuff a V8 in the Bronco, but the gov regulates automotive companies as a whole and they have avg mpg targets they need to hit by a certain year (which include all models outside of commercial vehicles I believe). Hence why companies have started using small displacement engines with boost. They can get epa rated at higher mpg's while offering solid performance.
Yep. I'd love to see what companies would offer without all the regsBasically, the government can't let us have what we want
World would be a much better place without Uncle and his busybodinessYep. I'd love to see what companies would offer without all the regs
I respectfully disagree.This is false. The 7.3l was built for abuse in work environments. Heavy loads and sustained rpms. Yes it's overbuilt, but it's not built for force induction from the factory. The 5.0 responds well to boost. It's strong and it flows well.
Aftermarket always has a solution to OEM's problem
Why would you ever buy a pre-made vehicle then? Just buy the pile of gloriously better aftermarket parts and build a vehicle yourself....
I trust aftermarket over oem
The 3.3 makes the most sense for the bronco to compete head to head with the wrangler. but I doubt ford will put it in. Its a shame its the ideal engine for it.What are your thoughts on the 3.3L NA V6 that serves as the base engine in the F-150 as an engine option for the Bronco?